[QUOTE="Cow4ever"][QUOTE="Ace6301"]While I agree that the income inequality in the US is caused by years and years of policies that favour the rich over the poor it doesn't really have too large a negative connotation for the US. The poor in the US aren't that poor off, at least when compared to the poor of other countries. That said I still disagree with the system favouring the rich since 30 years in it's pretty clear it doesn't really work too well for the country as a whole.Ace6301You make it sound like it's a country with only rich people. I think USA's policy benefits the majority of citizens, rich and middle class. Only the poor aren't benefited. Nah it doesn't help the middle class at all. It's very much a case of the rich get richer and everyone else gets more poor. Suntzu: I get all that I just didn't feel like bringing it up because I'm lazy. I don't believe that it's a good position to be in but there's certain people in this thread saying that the US is going the way of a 3rd world country and that's simply not true, not unless something drastic happens at least. Trust me I'd be one of the first to blame US policies for the last 30 years for where the world is right now. Brian: It's bad but it's not 3rd world country bad which as I said is what certain people seem to be claiming. Now maybe there's some kind of conspiracy to hide the worst of it from us foreigners but whenever I'm in the US and drive past the impoverished areas it's bad but nothing as bad as I've seen in actual 3rd world countries. The poor still have a ways to fall yet. I really do believe though that policies being continued as they are now will eventually lead to the poor taking another step down which wouldn't be pretty or as Tzu said good for anyone. How is low taxes and cheap products bad for the middle class? Yes if you're poor and dependent on welfare you'd probably do better in another country but for middle class.
Cow4ever's forum posts
lol the already had patent for it in 2009 so it's the other way around.Nintendo patented the Wii U controller in 2005 before the Wii remote was even shown.[QUOTE="Cow4ever"][QUOTE="dontshackzmii"]
cant wait to see how sony copys it
Nintendo_Ownes7
Everyone thought because the patent was for a Touch screen in the controller they thought Nintendo was going to have a Touch screen instead of the Wii Remote.
whatever. Gimmick nevertheless.Almost?[QUOTE="Cow4ever"][QUOTE="AzatiS"] But isnt wii almost dead, only Zelda left as major title? When on PS3/X360 titles coming in rapid style... You sound like gen is over already just because Wii is almost dead.vtbob88
If I read correctly the question is what console has made you the most happy this gen so far...or did I miss something. So how would the future having less games for Wii cause you to erase any fun you had for the past 5 years? Should we say the same when its the end of the ps3 or 360's life? "I really enjoyed the ps3...but because their are less games coming out for it now that ps4 is coming soon than I guess I was wrong, never had fun with it."
But no good games ever came out on the wii.[QUOTE="Maroxad"]But isnt wii almost dead, only Zelda left as major title? When on PS3/X360 titles coming in rapid style... You sound like gen is over already just because Wii is almost dead. Almost?The Wii is the console that kept me the most entertained, the PS3 is second and the 360 is third.
AzatiS
PS3 obviously. Worth buying it at launch.
While I agree that the income inequality in the US is caused by years and years of policies that favour the rich over the poor it doesn't really have too large a negative connotation for the US. The poor in the US aren't that poor off, at least when compared to the poor of other countries. That said I still disagree with the system favouring the rich since 30 years in it's pretty clear it doesn't really work too well for the country as a whole.Ace6301You make it sound like it's a country with only rich people. I think USA's policy benefits the majority of citizens, rich and middle class. Only the poor aren't benefited.
lol the already had patent for it in 2009 so it's the other way around.cant wait to see how sony copys it
dontshackzmii
UC3 seems to be suffering with bad AA, cheap Alpha particles, choppy split screen....so why not drop the resolution just a bit for the added performance? Even the top some top Graphicsl contenders have already taken the subHD route; Crysis 2 and BF3rich-sacCrysis 2 is nowhere near being a graphics contender. Most games look better, despite being HD.
I don't even consider it a console. It's 100% gimmick. Consoles are supposed to have nice games on them. Last time I cared about a Nintendo console was, uh, never. They only release garbage games.
Log in to comment