lol. Why would I need a DVD player in a console? I don't even use the blu-ray player in my PS3, so I don't think i'll be using a DVD player in the Wii U. It's just one of those unnecessary accessories which basically add nothing of value. I have a multi-media hub anyway, it's called a PC.
Cinematic experiences; they'll come in many genres but they'll all share the same theme.Eponique
I sincerelyhope you're wrong. :?
That being said, there are still allot of games which I can't see going that route, like The Elder scrolls (And pretty much all Bethesda games), LoZ (And pretty much all Nintendo titles), and various JRPG's. Those cinematic experiences are usually only limited to the Action adventure Genre, but it could change.
Whatever. The "Link died, so THIS happened" BS is still stupid, and I prefer my timeline.
AvatarMan96
No it's not. Especially when when you contrast the timeline with the order of Zelda titles by release date. It's the only thing they could've done.
So, they only put this because their games were so crazy and hardly tied back to each other? Smooth. And what would've happened if Skyward Sword Link died? Or Minish Cap Link?This is how it went down imo:
Miyamoto creates the LoZ as a story where a hero must defeat an over powerful creature named Ganon
Miyamoto decides to continue the story in a dirct sequel.
Miyamoto decides to create a story which begins to explain the events prior to the first two games.
He then creates a game which tells a story directly before his first game.
He then decides that he would like Link to take on different story lines in the game, so he creates OoT, a story where Link manages to defeat Ganon, and is sen't back to the past.
To kick of the second timeline, he creates a direct sequel to OoT, where Link follows the events of said game directly.
He then decides to fill the gap between Links awakening and A link to the past.
He decides to create a prequel to OoT, to show people the event prior.
He decides to create a third timeline, in which Link defeats Ganon in OoT but does not go back to the past. (Wind Waker)
Now he wants to bring back Vaati, but this time, in the events prior to defeating Ganon.
He then creates another prequel to further explain the events prior to OoT.
He then decides to show the events prior to Vaati's re-emergence.
He decides to continue Links adult branch with Phantom hourglass, and spirit tracks.
He then decides to show us how the Mastersword was forged, and ultimatley showing us the begining if the legend.
Its just nostalgia, nothing more. It was once great, now, compared to high quality 3rd party games its almost a generic adventure game.silversix_
How is it generic when every other big name game game uses 1997 controls, while The latest LoZ title, aswell as many other titles, pushes the latest control scemes.
How is it generic when every other big name game uses the generic and standardized quicktime events, button mashing controls, in fight cutscenes, whilst Zelda is purely play.
How is it just nostalgia if there are Zelda fans of all ages?
Glad all the Nintendo sheep are happy without analog sticks because their next console isnt getting any either. Btw, 44-5 in Reach tonight, dealing with dual analogs just fine. Dont cry just cuz u suck more than me.
Log in to comment