It seems like after the Genesis/Snes war, Nintendo completely lost focus of what a home console should be.
farrell2k
:lol:
yeah, sure buddy. That's why SONY and MS gave us pansy, unupgradable PCs (Mandatory installs and all) while the wii is the only traditional, plug and play console of this generation.
[QUOTE="bonesawisready5"][QUOTE="AtariKidX"] Did you notice the great scores for the most 3ds games.......lol Pokemon Rumble Blast .....poor 4.5..lolol Brunswick Pro Bowling ....5.0 Deca Sports Extreme ....3.5 Shinobi..........7.5 Tales of the Abyss ......7.0 Tetris Axis .....7.0 Driver: Renegade.....3.5. Star Fox 64 3D.....7.5 Cubic Ninja......5.5 Dream Trigger 3D.....6.0 Cartoon Network: Punch Time Explosion....5.5 Transformers: Dark of the Moon....3.0..lol LEGO Pirates....6.0 Rabbids Travel in Time 3D....6.0 Combat of Giants: Dinosaurs 3D....4.5 Madden NFL Football......4.0 Samurai Warriors Chronicles....4.5 Rayman 3D....7.0 Ridge Racer 3D....7.0 Bust-A-Move Universe....5.0 Asphalt 3D....5.5 Tom Clancy's Splinter Cell 3D....5.5 Steel Diver......4.5 Pilotwings Resort....6.5 Super Monkey Ball 3D....5.0 Pac-Man & Galaga Dimensions......6.0 Resident Evil: The Mercenaries 3D....6.5....and many many more.Awesome flop score list.....lololAtariKidX
Oh I know what critics may think about the games, I'm asking why you gave these games the scores you did when you haven't played them. You gave: Deca Sports Extreme, Brunswick Bowling each a 1.0 out of 10, Pokemon Rumble Blast a 2.0 out of 10, Star Fox 64 3D a 5.0 out of 10, among others. Please don't deflect the question, I'm not asking what critics scores are, I'm asking why do you rate games you haven't played with low scores? How do you know that i haven't play them.......??
Log in to comment