DAZZER7's forum posts

Avatar image for DAZZER7
DAZZER7

2422

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

26

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#1 DAZZER7
Member since 2004 • 2422 Posts

[QUOTE="DAZZER7"]

[QUOTE="mrarmyman48"] ps2 install base at GT3 launch=10,996,465 stop acting like the ps2 started out at 150 million units soldmrarmyman48

That makes no sense. It doesnt matter what the install base is when a game is released because the game can and will continue selling. The eventual install base will determine to a much greater degree the number of copies sold. The only way your statement can make sense is if a game only sells when it is released, hence it will be limited to the install base at that time. But we know thats not the case, we know that the PS2 install base grew to a huge 150m units and we also know that GT3 was on sale for all that time, right ? lol

yes because sony was still shipping millions of copies of GT3 after GT4 was released right? and millions were still buying GT3 with GT4 out...... (rolls eyes) Sigh.....GT4 came out in 05, so in about 44 months 15 million units were moved.

Yes the game was still being sold after GT4, it would have also had a platinum version etc. Stop pretending game stop selling after they are released (rolls eyes). There is no denying that the game was in shops through several christmas holidays on one of the most rapidly expanding install bases a console has seen.

Avatar image for DAZZER7
DAZZER7

2422

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

26

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#2 DAZZER7
Member since 2004 • 2422 Posts

[QUOTE="The__Havoc"]

[QUOTE="dream431ca"]

Nice excuse. Still wrong.

mrarmyman48

My man you seem to be the one making exuses. So you claim Forza is a AA franchise while GT is a AAA franchise. Still wrong? Well what makes him wrong and what makes you right?

Forza 1 = 9.2

Forza 2 = 9.2

GT1 = 8.5

GT2 = 8.6

GT3 = 9.4

GT4 = 8.9

GT doesn't even average out to a AAA score. So tell me. Explain to me how GT is a AAA franchise and how Forza is a AA Franchise. I already know I'm going to hear the exuse of you using gamerankings but maybe you'll give me something different and entertaining.

because its more logical to use only one website with one opinion, because the aggregate website which has hundreds of opinions is more accurate right? my logic is an excuse, while you hide behind some "technicality" to prove yourself right...(rolls eyes) continue your stay in fantasy land.....

While I agree gamespot is simply 1 opinion, using gamerankings incorperates reviews from many many biased sites including reviews from playstation magazine etc. Only a handful of sites offer unbiaised reviews (even then I have had my doubts). This skews the results slightly.

Avatar image for DAZZER7
DAZZER7

2422

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

26

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#3 DAZZER7
Member since 2004 • 2422 Posts

[QUOTE="dotWithShoes"]

install base.. thats all i gotta say.

mrarmyman48

ps2 install base at GT3 launch=10,996,465 stop acting like the ps2 started out at 150 million units sold

That makes no sense. It doesnt matter what the install base is when a game is released because the game can and will continue selling. The eventual install base will determine to a much greater degree the number of copies sold. The only way your statement can make sense is if a game only sells when it is released, hence it will be limited to the install base at that time. But we know thats not the case, we know that the PS2 install base grew to a huge 150m units and we also know that GT3 was on sale for all that time, right ? lol

Avatar image for DAZZER7
DAZZER7

2422

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

26

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#4 DAZZER7
Member since 2004 • 2422 Posts

[QUOTE="marklarmer"][QUOTE="Adrian_Cloud"] You've got to be kidding me, your going to come in here with that nonsense. Just because i disagree with your opinion doesn't mean i'm bashing the game. So since that is what you consider bashing. then sure, i must also be bashing the game now.

Adrian_Cloud

i'm not entirely sure who you're trying to fool, but when you make so many negative comments on a game in such a short amount of time it becomes inevitable that some people will start to notice.

I've made negative comments, about Too Human too.. and we all know how that game turned out. I've made negative comments about the Soul Calibur series, Blazblue, the new POP, assasins creed,mgs4,warhawk, dantes inferno( a complete rip off). So whats your point, i have to make fake good comments to appease the video games gods?

If there is a Forza 3 thread mentioning some new feature or new screen shots we can literally set our watches for when you will enter and say something negative. Now donb't get me wrong, I'm all for everyones right to disagree but when you're as consistent as you have been it becomes noticeable to everyone, I mean why is everyone singling you out for it?

We're not stupid and you can try telling us you've made positive comments etc but we all know you're extremely biased against the game. You always downplay every feature and you even use the odd positive comment to sneak 5 more negative comments. Like I said, we're not stupid and we've made our minds up about you...we're pretty sure we know where you're coming from ;)

Avatar image for DAZZER7
DAZZER7

2422

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

26

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#5 DAZZER7
Member since 2004 • 2422 Posts

I was a bit worried about them dumming things down with the game choosing so much but I like the fact that there are still consequences for bad choices. Poor tuning, wrong car etc etc.

Avatar image for DAZZER7
DAZZER7

2422

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

26

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#6 DAZZER7
Member since 2004 • 2422 Posts

[QUOTE="DAZZER7"]

[QUOTE="ToScA-"] Oh how I laughed ToScA-

#

at me? Why?

No, certainly not at you. Rather at: "Look, you aren't worth arguing with." this :lol:

oh all is good then lol

Avatar image for DAZZER7
DAZZER7

2422

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

26

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#7 DAZZER7
Member since 2004 • 2422 Posts

Don't kid yourself guys. This is exactly the game Bungie set out to do. A short sp and a new co-op mode. The game didn't magically got any bigger.

The thing is M$ saw they're 09 lineup dwindeling and tought that people will still buy it if they sell it at full price.

DarkyC

and get slammed in the ratings?? It goes against what Bungie have done previously. Some of you are being far too cynical. If this was EA or Ubisoft then maybe but lets atleast give Bungie the benefit of the doubt here. If they say more content has been added to the extent that its now a full retail game and no so much an expansion then I will atleast take their word for it.

I'm always willing to change my opinion of a given developer but until they give me reason to then I won't.

Avatar image for DAZZER7
DAZZER7

2422

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

26

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#8 DAZZER7
Member since 2004 • 2422 Posts

[QUOTE="freek666"]

[QUOTE="Hexagon_777"]

Blackbond was a n00b? :?

jg4xchamp

No he was like Ninja Master. I truly enjoyed his posts with gifs.

It was funny the first time, when Haze flopped.... Yeah that crap was hilarious........he never delivered a glorious hulk hogan gif though :(

RIP? He died or just got banned??

Avatar image for DAZZER7
DAZZER7

2422

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

26

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#9 DAZZER7
Member since 2004 • 2422 Posts

Lvl 1

15 posts

15 defensive posts VS PC... for not particular reasons

Admit some facts.... plzz? Is not so hard ...

If graphics dont matter at all , lets stick to DX5 then and play Quake-style graphics games for the rest of 2000.

Damage control at its best..thnx bb

AzatiS

Yeah, I couldn't miss the unmistakable smell of flame-bait lol.

Im still waiting for consoles to actually do decent amounts of AA, native 1080p at solid 60 frames per second. We were promised a lot at the beginning of this gen and we still havent seen them.

Avatar image for DAZZER7
DAZZER7

2422

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

26

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#10 DAZZER7
Member since 2004 • 2422 Posts

[QUOTE="Hanass"]

[QUOTE="stvee101"]

That it looks better than any other console game out there is enough for me.

I'd have thought the fact that the PS3 can't compete with more much more modern and expensive hardware was a given and pretty much irrelevent?

So why do people feel the need to spam the damn crysis pics all the time? Does it give them a sense of satisfaction of "owning" the TC?

stvee101

Yes it does. It also helps shut the cows' big mouths when it comes to graphics. Them claiming "grafix king lulz" is considered having a big mouth because it's physically impossible.

I've noticed when it comes to these threads where PS3 fans proclaim "PS3 exclusive#143" to be graphics king,people take great delight in pointing out the obvious i.e crysis is the true graphics king and the consoles can't compare to a gaming rig. Most PS3 owners already know this.Myself included. :|

The crysis spammers and ultra-defensive hermits just make themselves look a little pathetic and desperate to be honest in arguing and trying to "own" deluded fanboys/trolls such as the TC. Save yourselves the effort and ingnore these threads if it really bothers you.

Wait wait let me get this straight, us hermits are not even allowed to defend our games when challenged by some uninformed cow? Every other group on system wars is permitted to discuss their games and correct those who are incorrect etc but hermits? :lol:

Why dont we write a new sticky for hermits then according to cows and this new sticky will list some new rules that only apply to hermits. Things like banning hermits from defending crysis even if the thread is actually started by a cow comparing game-x to it? I know, we'll outright ban all Crysis screenshots, yes? Umm lets see what else, lets see what other rules we can subject hermits and only hermits to right?