For a country that hates us, they sure do have a tedency to use clips of American made entertainment in their propoganda videos.  Anyone remember them using footage from the movie Top Gun in one of their videos?

Hallenbeck77

The late Kim Jong Il made no secret about his love for American Cinema.

I really don't see why any doctor would prescribe Oxy TBH for therapy. It'll turn most people in a coke-head.Fightingfan

Depending on the therapy, it could be extremely painful. I have a long history with opiate based painkillers, relating to a medical condition. I can see how it could be easy to get hooked on them. I'm confident that the only reason I never became dependant on them was because I did one thing. I followed the f%$@ing directions on the bottle. People become dependant on the drugs because they start taking more than they are supposed to. I don't like it when people demonize painkillers because people start going against what their doctor tells them, which gets them hooked on them. I know for a fact that painkillers saved my life in many ways, they are miracle drugs.

I have a Savage mark 2 bolt action. I picked it because it is one of the best bang for the buck .22 rifles you can get. I was planning on getting my pistol licence but NY ended up banning most of the pistols I wanted to get, so f*ck it.

Ingenemployee

I ordered a Savage Mark II F .22lr on Tuesday. I'm waiting on Budsgunshop to mail it to my FFL. It sounds like an awesome little rifle.

As of now, in the order I bought them. I have a Ruger SR40c, Taurus 738 TCP, DPMS AR15, CZ-75 in 9mm, HK USP in .45, 91/30 Mosin Nagant, Norinco SKS, Enfield 1917, Makarov IJ70, & a Smith & Wesson 686. The Savage Mark II should be here within the next couple weeks. I waited far too long to get a .22, a .22 should be the first thing a new gun owner buys.

Umm, didn't they successfully launch a satellite into space using roughly the same long range rocket? Like, a month ago?Nibroc420

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/18/world/asia/north-korean-satellite.html?_r=0

Deemed a failure. NK can't succesfully detonate a nuke, they can't succesfully launch a long range rocket. Thank you media for the daily dose of fear mongering.

My choice isn't on the list,dave123321

Mine isn't either.

I prefer my "nuggets" dunked in cosmoline.

I always laugh a little, the US has drones that kill from miles away, but people claim the need for guns to protect themselves. Its just silly

LaytonsCat

When you have to deal with 100s of millions of combatants. The field becomes a little more level.

[QUOTE="thegerg"][QUOTE="YoshiYogurt"]There is no reason to own a gun, on the other hand there's no reason to take them away. Nothing will change. Crazy people will still be crazy.YoshiYogurt

It's good to know that you represent the entirety of humanity and it's needs.

[QUOTE="DJ419"]

[QUOTE="Ace6301"] I'm not trying to be a douche bag. I'm trying to educate you on your own countries legal terms on this issue. You are being a douchebag by kicking and screaming and insulting me over a term that was a part of your countries Federal law for 10 years and only ended because it expired, not because it was deemed unconstitutional. Ace6301

So since that law has now expired, which is your basis on your definition of an assault weapon. AR 15s can no longer be described as assault weapons right?

A law which no longer exists.

[QUOTE="airshocker"]

[QUOTE="Ace6301"]This. I don't agree with it but to say it isn't a legal term when it quite literally is a term used in laws with predefined explicitly stated boundaries is pretty goddamn silly. It is literally a legal term. If you're going to argue the legality of this then you should know: It is a legal term. It covers the AR-15 and always has. This is stated explicitly.Ace6301

No, you're simply trying to be a douchebag. You're trying to justify a term that has been used to describe any weapon that has killed a person. A term coined for the sole purpose of scaring people and confusing them.

So since that law has now expired, which is your basis on your definition of an assault weapon. AR 15s can no longer be described as assault weapons right?

[QUOTE="DJ419"]

[QUOTE="Ace6301"] It being a semi-automatic rifle capable of accepting a detachable magazine and two or more attachments including telescopic stocks, pistol grips, bayonet mounts, flash suppressor or a grenade launcher. The AR-15 fits this and is explicitly stated as an Assault Weapon. So rather than saying this is some new BS thing the government is just trying to do why don't you actually look at your own legality and notice it's been an Assault Weapon since 20 years ago.Ace6301

[citation needed]

That was not a court ruling.