@b74kd3th racists? If anything I'd imagine they're being sexist in this case (which is still bad of course).

@Zevvion yeah but she says the story is good so what's really to complain about to this extent. If the story was crap then not having improved anywhere would be costly.

I don't see how doing more of the same is a bad thing. It may not deserve a very high score but punishing it for offering the same thing the previous 2 games did seems very unfair (ironically considering the score is called "Fair"). You can tax it for not improving but this seems overkill.

If it's not broke, don't try to fix it.

Fair? You know what's fair? A 7-8, above average but not amazing. Way too harsh. Countless games rinse and repeat and they don't suffer this kind of scrutiny.

@b74kd3th flag, ffs it's right there at every comment lol.

@TheJamin @Merkasaw lol, don't get too excited guys, it's just a rebranding of a few GPUs at a smaller price and some extra software. You're not missing anything.

@wildamnesia this comment > your random comment.

@LordOtman Turn off your adblock buddy.

@chuckles471 I'm not on the anti Carolyn bandwagon but that sentence really does seem very self indulgent and self praising.

@jcopp72 I strongly disagree, it was bullshit that the game got a free pass and was scored by critics before the online came out, Rockstar deliberately postponed the online half of the game so that it doesn't affect the critic reception, games don't usually get away with this sleazy tactic and this shouldn't be treated any differently.

Original 151 for life!