So I just got my router running again and my DS has been testing the connection for a good twenty minutes now, is this normal?

So I was thinking today about having a game that is totally user controlled, there is a story line, I dont know what it is, but it should be great, so okay, there are three parts, there is the FPS/RPG portion in which you build up your character by participating in small battles that serve as training that take placeon farms, fields, and what not, andyou can beeither a sniper, medic, you know the usual classes and whatnot, but there is the RTS portion in whichtwo players recruit different soldiers to battleeach other, and thewhole game revolves around this, most RTS dudes, can choose to actually gointothe battlefield if there is not much to take care of, there will bea hierarchy that all FPS playersmust climbupon. There is a flight simulator portion for air combatand such, but yeah, what you all think?

The halo games have always been 30 fps. mostly due to choice, Bungie said that running it in 30 fps makes the game move slower but at the same time makes players think more methodically before each attack as opposed to jsut running in gunning, if they wanted a straigh run and gun game they would have made it run at 60 fps, I think its on the Halo 2 disc

Ed

As of today, cheesy smile time

IGN reported that the release date will be 11/20/2007

Its a demo called .theprodukkt, and its a pretty big demo, great graphics and physics, and it's only 96Kb, I recommend you all DL it to see how well it turned out.

http://212.202.219.162

[QUOTE="Damien_Torrence"]

Yeah but I dont think all of those countries have freedom of speech, and I didnt say we would loose an american right I was just saying that it would be unconstitutional, and in this country when we equate corporations as human beings it is a form of losing a right. PhoebusFlows

Well one is Australia, and I believe Germany will ban it (they banned Gears of War). Japan and England are other possible places.

These countries, which have banned games before, are democratic societies with freedom of speech. I'm afriad you are making too big a deal out of a video game. If I really, really worked on it, I'll produce a list of CDs, albums, paintings, books, articles, magazines, and video games banned IN THIS COUNTRY for centuries. And guess what, we have grown more progressive and powerful, not the reverse. I'm almost insulted you have little understanding of our legal system, and you give Manhunt 2 too much credit for being so "symbolically important to liberty"

I'm not giving the game any symbollic importance, hell to me it's like the hostel movies and I cant stand those movies, what I'm saying is that saying Manhunt 2 will make serial killers out of all those who pick it up is just not logical, and yeah, sure it may be banned in other countries that are democratic and have a form of free speech but my point is that having a freedom of speech clause and banning something is a contradiction especially in this country where it is so strongly cared of. True this country has banned albums, books, and other forms of media, but does that make it right? Yeah, sure we have progressed, but to what? A society in which we vote more for pop singers than presidents, has the least efficient educational system, health care that is nearly unaffordable by most who need it, and a corporation is treated like a human entety, is that really progress?