I have around 14 games for the PSP, and i think half of them i still have to play. Right now i'm playing and enjoying very much Jeanne D'Ark. Awesome strategy RPG that any fan of the genre should try.
Dying or not, i like it very much. I recently changed my PSP-1000 by the new PSP-3000, and, imo, an amazing little device just got even better. Yes, it is not having the great success Sony hoped for (blame the DS), and it is not having the abundance of games the PS2 had, but there are very enjoyable games for it. For instance, one little game released for it in 2007, that i just bought this year, is making me play my PSP right now even more than i play my 360, PS3 or DS. That game is Jenne D'Ark. Awesome strategy RPG. Also, i'm very excited about the new Parasite Eve game. I waited all the PS2 generation for a sequel to this amazing series, but i'm glad now that i will be able to play it on the go. But sure, i'm missing games like Gran Turismo and Devil May Cry on it. Well, but one thing is for sure, there is still great enjoyment to be had with my PSP
I recently changed my original PSP-1000 by the PSP-3000. I couldn't be more happy. It has all the enhancements of the PSP-2000 (slimmer and lighter, video output, Skype, more RAM for quicker loading times and better internet browsing), plus the built-in mic and the new LCD screen. IMF, the new screen was the main reason that made me buy a PSP-3000. All the enhancements of the PSP-2000are great, sure, but they alone weren't big enough to make me upgrade to it. But all that with the better LCD screen of the PSP-3000 was too good to pass. About the new LCD screen, well, it's awesome. It has more vibrant colors, yes, but the best improvement, imo, is the better response time. On games like Rondo of Blood (Castlevania: The Dracula X Chronicles), my original PSP-1000 displayed too much "ghosting" for my tastes, but on the PSP-3000, it's practically non-existent. About the scanlines, i'm yet to see them. I highly recommend the PSP-3000.
That's a sign of how things changed. On PS1 an PS2 Sony never bothered about the "exclusive" labels, and to be honest, it didn't have to. Now Sony isn't the market leader anymore, and it's the first time it uses a "exclusive" label on its game boxes. Yes, things have changed indeed.
It's not that good anyways. They reviewed it for the PS3 and is fairly old too since it also came out for the PC a while back. You're not missing much trust me.
.
InjuredNoodle
See that "U" icon on my GamerCard"? I own it and i love it. But it is not a matter of the quality of the game, but the fact that GameSpot haven't reviewed it yet, and i think that's strange. I still like this site ( i know it since 1999), but unfortunately it isn't to be trusted anymore, and that's what i was trying to say.
Isn't strange that there's no review of it yet here on GameSpot? Thinking about it it's even more strange that after the "murder" of the best rating system on the business and the "Gettersmangate" i still care. Oh boy, i miss the good old GameSpot. Good days, good days fellow gamers.
Isn't strange that there's no review of it yet here on GameSpot? Thinking about it it's even more strange that after the "murder" of the best rating system on the business and the "Gettersmangate" i still care. Oh boy, i miss the good old GameSpot. Good days, good days fellow gamers.
Log in to comment