@olddadgamer: I don't think that's depressing. They are a relatively small studio. It's not Rockstar or CD Projekt. Their games are massive. Elder Scrolls games take a long time to develop. And then, they bought the Fallout franchise. That's two franchises that take a lot of resources to create. It's great that they've found the time to work on something original.
@ballashotcaller: Already is Doom II. In fact, I still have it on 5 floppies. It's already confusing as it to have a conversation about Doom (1993) and Doom (2016).
@sdzald: He clearly said that Starfield and ES6 is something beyond this year - most likely 2020. Point of this reveal was to shut people up and let everyone know that YES, they are working on ES6. They're probably either finishing up the new engine, or heavily modifying the Fallout 4 engine.
Cyberpunk has taken years to get to this point and CD Projekt has a lot more people working on it than Bethesda on ES games.
And ES6 and ESO don't share resources. One is from Bethesda, the other from its parent company that got greedy and wanted on the MMORPG train.
@Berserk8989: Why? Online piece bothers you? Most people want experience Elder Scrolls with friends. Fallout 76 allows you to play by yourself -- I'm sure ES6 will too. I don't get how people still complain about inclusion of multiplayer in 2018.
@dkjenvey: No, it started with Morrowind. That's when they got Jeremy Soule to write the soundtrack. Arena and Daggerfall had a different composer and theme.
@BuyaPC: Witcher 3 was an adventure game with lame RPG elements. Let's hope this is a proper RPG, in DeuxEx style and not another 100 hours of story time where you have zero impact on the world.
Deckard2323's comments