The only Crysis game i've played was Crysis 2, and I had a pretty fun time (Almost felt it was underrated). The campaign was relatively long and I enjoyed it. The story wasn't amazing but I got into it. I really like the concept of having to choose what your energy goes too, either stealth, shield, or running/jumping. When it came to multiplayer you can really see they didn't put as much effort into it; it was hybrid between Halo and COD. But standards were raised due to the fact the market is saturated with FPSs. So now each game must really stand out and be original in a market where most things have been done before. MOH Warfighter failed because it was generic, Crysis 3 looks like it did nothing to change it up. So what I think, if a game gets to a point where it can't really be changed up, they should heavily focus on the story. You will be recognized if your story is amazing.
Buying the game and possibly the DLC is already enough money invested in a game. I will never put money for these microtransactions. They are retarded and just shows how willing a company is to take your money.
I've never played a Tomb Raider game but this looks very good. I'm glad it seems they put a lot of effort into the story. I might actually pick this up!
I have not played DayZ yet, but I've always been interested in playing in. I think I might just wait for the stand alone at this point. It looks pretty good as of right now. I wish I saw some zombies, because I know the animation looked glitchy. I kind of hope there is like a singleplayer mode to just play and learn the game without the worry of other players trying to kill you. Along the lines of that it would be interesting to be able to just play with friends, but either way I'm interested in seeing how this turns out. Better than that rip-off scam called WarZ (Honestly you could have at least made the name different)
Dinostrich's comments