.

Guess the TC, didn't think this one through. Next time better understand the game and how it is, Snake has an importance in the first game, he is needed...i won't go into detail incase some one still hasn't played it and wants too.

gsus people calm down....they are NOT my shots, but forum posters shots..doing there own comparision (hence the link i provided), the shots clearly show the PS3 and 360 version by the buttons A and O..so you can tell, YES they have off screen shots, but hows that make it a BS comparison, when the PS3 version shows more detailed in these screens?

How can off screen shots, kill detail and add more detail LOL, it is what it is.

[QUOTE="tmntPunchout"][QUOTE="HPPL3"]

How the hell did this game get a 9.0 ?

Who the hell reviewed the game?

Its better in every way then Gears 1 and scores lower?

HPPL3

New standards to compare it to...

The dude says its a superior shooter...?

And what the hell kind of word is fiddly?

I say overseas Xbox 360 hate played a role in the reviewers score.

I'm so sick of these darn amateur reviewers.

err, standards are raised, when gears 1 came out..we didn't have games like Uncharted, MGS4, dead space and other top titles...reviews EXPECT a lot more now. Glad your not a reviewer. Think how bias you would be..lol.

9.0 is still amazing..AAA...gsus, relax.

After some comparisons being done on other forums, it was shown that actually the PS3 version has some noticeable advantages over the Xbox 360 version, specially for textures and specular lighting, here are some PICS:

360:

PS3:

metal parts are glossy on the PS3, it's completely flat on the 360

360:

PS3:

this one's the much talked 'access panel', unlike what people have suspected, the base textrue is identical. only difference is that the PS3 version's got normal map, the 360 got none looking totally flat.

360:

PS3:

the ps3 version of roaches look just beautiful with detailed normal map, 360 version is just flat textured. the giant ants & scorpions are similar, the ps3 version being realistic with high-res normal map.

360:

PS3:

even rocks are different. the 360 version's got normal map, but it's in much lower res. it's just more detailed and sharp on the ps3

360:

PS3:

the last but not least. the 360 version look terrible with flat low res texture, where the ps3 version is just beautiful blonde hair with so much detail..

It is incredible that NONE of the game review sites mentioned this OBVIOUS difference, talk about the BIAS this gen., yet Bethesda has to deliver a patch to fix the already known ps3 bugs.

Link

Most anticipated game.

Can't wait. Looks stunning, story looks epic and gameplay good as ever. We have barely seen much, which is good...so wanna be suprised.

They care about dominance and MONEY! The rest is done for that to be achieved, even if it looks like they care.

[QUOTE="Eyezonmii"][QUOTE="SnakePS360Gamer"][QUOTE="Eyezonmii"]

I want my 2 minutes back.

Seriously, why are so many people close minded? Just because a predessor scores low and isn't that good. doesn't mean the next will fail, developers can learn from there mistakes, right? K2's budget is massive, add the 100 extra people working on it and first class Sony support since they are fully behind the title...don't be suprised if the game scores good and does MUCH better than its previous one, BTW since when has a SONY title flopped?

The difference in development is HUGE, and impressions and preview state the game not only looks AMAZING but plays great.

Wait and see or ATLEAST use some evidence to back up your claims. gsus!

Episode_Eve

SO what was the point of this thread? I think it started off serious, but since i shot down his flawed argument, its now a joke? lol, RIIIIGHT.

I don't care, their are still many with this train of thought, my post can be a reality check...hows that?

Fine, i'll laugh...HAHAHAHA, GOT ME!

Love your sig BTW.