[QUOTE="-NickJC1-"]

A better question would be "Is Halo needed?"

No it's not needed, it's been terribly average since the end of the first game, if you're not tired of shooting over grown care bears in rainbow suits then ask yourself why.

Ninja-Hippo

95%

95%

93%

Get over it already. :P

LOL, did you just use scores to shoot down someones actual opinion on the title?

thats like trying to shoot through a brick wall with spit balls.

A better question would be "Is Halo needed?"

No it's not needed, it's been terribly average since the end of the first game, if you're not tired of shooting over grown care bears in rainbow suits then ask yourself why.

-NickJC1-

Nuh, i love halo...Halo Combat Evovled is still the best one, IMO.

i just hate when developers do these side stuff and expansions or whatever.

YES

http://au.ps3.ign.com/articles/917/917969p1.html

1) Already a huge thread on this; was this needed?

2) It's one of several projects going on at bungie. This one is being worked on by a "smal, agile team" and by the guys who've been working on Halo since day one.

3) It is an FPS.

4) How can you say a game is uncalled for? :? They're just extending Halo 3, which makes sense seeing as so many people bought it and still play it. I think it's a much better idea to do what bungie are doing, releasing a steady stream of new maps and new content for a game everyone owns, rather than going years with nothing at all while making a new game.

Ninja-Hippo

lol, what?..that makes no sense, considering 1 and 2 didn't get this treatment. don't need to have an excuse to get defensive, i just want Halo 4, this side stuff usually isn't big.

Why not just work on Halo 4?

I'm all for it, but seems like milkage, its unlike bungie to make these side stuff from an already released title. Not saying it will be bad, but the term RECON and HALO, seems forced and uncalled for.

Will this still be a FPS or something else anyways?

[QUOTE="Eyezonmii"][QUOTE="mephisto_11"][QUOTE="Eyezonmii"]

again, you assume things, lol....wow!

A) i never said you said it sucked. -I never said you did you claimed we thought you thought it sucked, read your own replies. Maybe i should of put "we" happy?

B) your already predicting a score, by footages that constantly show one area and limited gameplay. -read below your opinion is fine, but RE4 in HD doesn't make your opinion look valid.

C) Capcom aren't Nintendo -Never said that either. What's this about assumptions your using zelda, to assume...lol. totally different games.

D) judging footage is fine, but already predicting a score and claiming is RE4 in HD is another matter, which i am correcting you. -You did not correct me, in fact im now more convinced that i'm right what ever makes u sleep at night, point is, next time don't assume things and and try and pass it on as facts, state IMO and learn to wait and see MORE of the title. its common sense.

mephisto_11

might as well shut down all of system wars

here you have it folks, no prediction and discussing potential flaws of upcoming games (unless it is 100% favorable)

you sure you're in the right forum?

still assuming and not reading? PRICELESS!

lol seriously not going to bother. your not explaining your points to me your simply telling me to stop "assuming" in every one of your replies. k im done

awesome, a tpyical response by someone who got corrected. nothing left to say, now?

all i'm saying is, you assume things, with not enough or evidence at all to back it up, more like a bashing post..atleast state IYO or BUT i'll wait and see more of it...you just came across as ignorant and misinformed.

but its cool.

i wouldn't have agured if we had MORE gameplay footage and overall detail to judge it THAT MUCH, its like u had the game all figured out. you don't.

[QUOTE="Eyezonmii"]

again, you assume things, lol....wow!

A) i never said you said it sucked. -I never said you did you claimed we thought you thought it sucked, read your own replies. Maybe i should of put "we" happy?

B) your already predicting a score, by footages that constantly show one area and limited gameplay. -read below your opinion is fine, but RE4 in HD doesn't make your opinion look valid.

C) Capcom aren't Nintendo -Never said that either. What's this about assumptions your using zelda, to assume...lol. totally different games.

D) judging footage is fine, but already predicting a score and claiming is RE4 in HD is another matter, which i am correcting you. -You did not correct me, in fact im now more convinced that i'm right what ever makes u sleep at night, point is, next time don't assume things and and try and pass it on as facts, state IMO and learn to wait and see MORE of the title. its common sense.

mephisto_11

might as well shut down all of system wars

here you have it folks, no prediction and discussing potential flaws of upcoming games (unless it is 100% favorable)

you sure you're in the right forum?

still assuming and not reading? PRICELESS!

[QUOTE="Eyezonmii"][QUOTE="mephisto_11"][QUOTE="Optusnet"]

[QUOTE="mephisto_11"]Gears 2 is much better. don't get me wrong it looks like a great game, probably AAA but meh it seems like the creators haven't added anything new besides making the control scheme more like gears.mephisto_11

I'm with you. I'd take Gears 2 over RE5 anyday. RE5 is a carbon copy of RE4 but with some superficial changes and co-op. That's not bad at all, but hardly revolutionary.

I agree to an extent. Re5 looks like a game i'd love to play. probably one of the best games in 09 but realistically, its re4 in hd with coop and i could definately see it getting 8.5. i don't see where the tc is going with calling all exclusives "petty" in comparison.

what the hell are you talking about?

You haven't played the game to even suggest such nonsense. Capcom have said their are elements to the game YET TO BE SHOWN, we haven't seen it all, the new control sheme is optional (a control sheme many games use, so capcom wanted a variety of people to be able to pick up and play) the normal controls are still there. the TC can say what he wants, we don't judge and rate something before its even out. you don't know what GS will give it. stop assuming things.

just because you prefer another game, doesn't make this game have a higher chance of scoring low.

lol, amazing how people judge a few gameplay footages (showing the same stuff) and think thats it, thats all RE5 is.

RE5 is a survival horror game, your not going to see anything OVER the top.

wait and see.

and if you've played RE4, you'd notice some already detail differences in gameplay. From healing, melee's, animations, team recovery, etc. its still a sequal, not a different game. lol

wow calm down

first of all i never said the game sucked and the TC pointed out how other games looked "petty" in comparison and this game is AAAA. I don't see you jumping on him.

Anyways I still think the game looks far too similar to RE4 from what we've seen so far and 8.5 wouldn't be so far fetched. Remember what happened to ZTP? Still has a great chance at AAA but it could swing both ways depending on how much the reviewer emphasizes this criteria.

And your last part about judging footage makes no sense. Everyone here is judging the game by the footage, including you i might add, otherwise we have nothing to go by. You just don't find my view favorable.

again, you assume things, lol....wow!

A) i never said you said it sucked.

B) your already predicting a score, by footages that constantly show one area and limited gameplay.

C) Capcom aren't Nintendo

D) judging footage is fine, but already predicting a score and claiming is RE4 in HD is another matter, which i am correcting you.

[QUOTE="Optusnet"]

[QUOTE="mephisto_11"]Gears 2 is much better. don't get me wrong it looks like a great game, probably AAA but meh it seems like the creators haven't added anything new besides making the control scheme more like gears.mephisto_11

I'm with you. I'd take Gears 2 over RE5 anyday. RE5 is a carbon copy of RE4 but with some superficial changes and co-op. That's not bad at all, but hardly revolutionary.

I agree to an extent. Re5 looks like a game i'd love to play. probably one of the best games in 09 but realistically, its re4 in hd with coop and i could definately see it getting 8.5. i don't see where the tc is going with calling all exclusives "petty" in comparison.

what the hell are you talking about?

You haven't played the game to even suggest such nonsense. Capcom have said their are elements to the game YET TO BE SHOWN, we haven't seen it all, the new control sheme is optional (a control sheme many games use, so capcom wanted a variety of people to be able to pick up and play) the normal controls are still there. the TC can say what he wants, we don't judge and rate something before its even out. you don't know what GS will give it. stop assuming things.

just because you prefer another game, doesn't make this game have a higher chance of scoring low.

lol, amazing how people judge a few gameplay footages (showing the same stuff) and think thats it, thats all RE5 is.

RE5 is a survival horror game, your not going to see anything OVER the top.

wait and see.

and if you've played RE4, you'd notice some already detail differences in gameplay. From healing, melee's, animations, team recovery, etc. its still a sequal, not a different game. lol

crysis still winsnjean777

wth:|

Crysis is already out.