Eyezonmii's forum posts

Avatar image for Eyezonmii
Eyezonmii

2145

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1 Eyezonmii
Member since 2008 • 2145 Posts
[QUOTE="Eyezonmii"][QUOTE="user_nat"]

Would be nice to see a version that wasn't filmed off screen.. so I could actually hear whats being said.

Looking good (like AAA good) to me. Although I think the overall awesomeness of the graphics is exaggerated by most, but still the best around anyhow.

edit: And the the jaggies discussion, they are deffinently there, which isn't really a good thing seeing as off screen shots tend to hide stuff like that. All the motion blur when the character is running does appear to remove them though.

(from high quality)

IMO, alot of that is probably a result of the video, seeing as the text is really fuzzy also. Even if the game does look like that, I don't care. Jaggies have never bothered me (obvious since Halo 3 is my most player game this gen).

marklarmer
It won't look like that, the vid isn't even HD, hell its a youtube vid. Well a game looks this good, why should anyone care for minor jags and issues? Its STILL beyond everything out there, when it comes a complete visual package...Killzone 2 does it all. But i guess, haters need something to diss it with. (not talking about you)

maybe because Mass Effect and Forza both got pounded into the ground by reviewers because of jaggies and other graphical failings. Yet like MGS4 i'm sure we'll see no negative comments on KZ2s graphics.

They won't be that noticeable, tho...What about all the previews, impressions....and people who have played it, barely anyone has complained about jaggies.
Avatar image for Eyezonmii
Eyezonmii

2145

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#3 Eyezonmii
Member since 2008 • 2145 Posts

oooooh. i love this :D

Fact:

RE5 looks better on the 360, noticeably. (see kotaku preview, and other major site previews)

Fact:

I've always said the PS3 isn't tough to program for, just has bottlenecks that make it hard to make games look as good as the 360 with multiplats.

Fact:

This kind of confirms things. RE5 looks worse on the PS3, but the devs say it wasn't hard. Well of course it isn't hard, just have to drop the visual quality to get it running at a decent framerate.'

lets see how cows try to spin this. b-b-b-b-but teh lazy devs.

3picuri3
Fact! Kotaku can't be trusted, See gametrailers comparison of the game, it looks indentical, with the PS3 version better due to the fact that Bullet holes are left when shooting skulls (see the comparison) the 360 version leaves no bullet impressions. Fact! PS3 has a different architecture to that of a typical PC one...so their is a learning curve. Due to this, if the PS3 isn't the lead plats for Multiplats, it suffers. Depending on the skills of the developers and how much more money and time can be put into the PS3. Fact! RE5 looks the same as the 360 version. Lems, srsly..get informed.
Avatar image for Eyezonmii
Eyezonmii

2145

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#4 Eyezonmii
Member since 2008 • 2145 Posts

Link

(don't forget to click on HIGH QUALITY, and pick up your chins from the floor)

Thank You!

Avatar image for Eyezonmii
Eyezonmii

2145

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#5 Eyezonmii
Member since 2008 • 2145 Posts

No, it's still an awesome game. It's just whoever made the decisions behind the multiplayer for gears 2 needs to drop down a very dark hole and never touch anything again.

Epic broke the golden rule in multiplayers: Don't flipping change the core gameplay. Most devs are smart enough to giv eyou a brand new campaign, lots of features and EXPAND the multiplayer.

Epic saw it had a popular game, that remained in the top 5 for 2 years and was massively popular, had it's own tournaments and such going for it and thought "lets change everything" and now the result is Gears 2 is quickly dropping off the top 10, it's been getting bumped down everytime Major Nelson puts a new list up.

CreepyBacon
They just tried to hard, felt the pressure and thought a sequal needs to be a different game..Cliffy should stop listening to some fans..i bet the whole 1.5 BS remakes (many games get) got to him. Seeing how popular gears 1 was, why did they alter the gameplay? srsly, i don't understand that...bu bu teh balancing issues, gears 2 has more balancing issues than the first. so yeh i agree with you. Gears 1 simply feels more intense, fast and in your face fun action, gears 2 feels like a clunky meaty and slow action game.
Avatar image for Eyezonmii
Eyezonmii

2145

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#6 Eyezonmii
Member since 2008 • 2145 Posts
Sorry, theres no other game like Gears of War on consoles period. Gears cant 'move on' even if it wants to. Games need gears like christians need jesus. IshmaelSonata
LOL, thanks for the laugh. You should work for MS.
Avatar image for Eyezonmii
Eyezonmii

2145

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#7 Eyezonmii
Member since 2008 • 2145 Posts
kinda getting sick of the whole corny mucho man action shooters approach gears has. It was great for awhile, but i can't go back to playing the story modes no more. I wish gears took it self serious and Epic ditches some of the crap humor, make it more cold and down to the point. boost up the horror elements and just make it more interesting. big bosses, cursing, over done gore ppeal, doesn't last long. but i guess with a guy like Cliffy, those changes will never be made.
Avatar image for Eyezonmii
Eyezonmii

2145

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#8 Eyezonmii
Member since 2008 • 2145 Posts
[QUOTE="Eyezonmii"]R2 is more superior TECHNICALLY...its less linear, bigger bosses, more stuff going on, on screen...60 players online, etc. 1 thing i really liked about resistance was the feeling of being in a real war, i was surprised. Character detail is also more better, imo. Gears 2 just wins in textures..and overall a better storyline. McdonaIdsGuy


The game still linear..is an FPS and it isn't an open world game,can you go everywhere in the map? thats what i thought..

WOW, defensive much? Did i say R2 was non-linear and open world? lol....I said it was LESS linear, learn to read and think before typing. Of course R2 is linear..gsus.
Avatar image for Eyezonmii
Eyezonmii

2145

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9 Eyezonmii
Member since 2008 • 2145 Posts
R2 is more superior TECHNICALLY...its less linear, bigger bosses, more stuff going on, on screen...60 players online, etc. 1 thing i really liked about resistance was the feeling of being in a real war, i was surprised. Character detail is also more better, imo. Gears 2 just wins in textures..and overall a better storyline.
Avatar image for Eyezonmii
Eyezonmii

2145

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#10 Eyezonmii
Member since 2008 • 2145 Posts
I wish Marcus and Dom never gave Chris steroids; but peer pressure is tough. PKim7
guess you never played RE1 on PS1 and seen Jack Krauser in RE4.