the chainsaw still looks like the funnest weapon to usemurat8

As expected. It looks highly realistic.

[QUOTE="Fondness"]In passing, this topic is about Gears of War 2, not about Killzone 2. VoodooHak

Yes, of course. At the same time, this is System Wars. The PS3 fanboys feel the need to compare to two.

And they're allowed to do that. I just don't want people to discuss about Killzone. Nevertheless, as you say, they're allowed to show how these two games are alike and different.

[QUOTE="FerdMertz"]This is a serious question, I'm a PC noob. I always read comments about how far ahead PC graphics are than the PS3/360, but aside from Crysis I'm not seeing it. Is a hermits idea of graphical dominance one game (Crysis) coupled with minimal performance improvements on games like Assassin's Creed and Bioshock? I ask this because I don't follow PC games closely. Everytime X Play or Gametrailers TV shows a PC exclusive I think the graphics look pretty weak with terrible animations in particular. Then when I come here I always see stuff about how advanced PC graphics are.........and like I said, I just don't see it.dgsag

Company of Heroes, World in Conflict, STALKER, what else do you need? ;)

Crysis.

damn this game looks great murat8

It unquestionably does. :)

[QUOTE="lolkie_81"][QUOTE="Nolan16"][QUOTE="leviathan91"][QUOTE="micki_free"][QUOTE="carljohnson3456"]

If it was on the 360, I guarantee you'd be looking forward to it too. Maybe not hyping it to oblivion like some cows, but you'd be excited for it too.

Nolan16

so you're claiming that if a graphically impressive sequel to a crappy game from a crappy developer was announced for the 360, lemmings would be all over it.

Somehow I doubt that lemmings are going to go crazy over something like brute force 2, no matter how good it looks

This is what I keep telling those stupid GTA fanboys! The first and second GTA was crap and they kept hyping the thir... oh wait a minute. GTA: Vice City was actually very good. :|

Just because it's a sequal to a game that "sucks" doesn't mean it's going to be the same. Recent previews from IGN and Kotaku have confirmed that Killzone 2 will be a good game.

it's okay dude because they know the future holds bashing for them about KZ2 knocking off there graphics king.

[/QUOTE

Geows 2 looks better than kz2. Thats my opinion, Why are you trying to pass your opinion as fact? Kz2 has no color bad textures and the only thing that really looks great is the gun. I think cows just run around stating there opinion as fact until people start to belive them.

lol looks at both photos side by side like i did you can easily see KZ2 looks better gears looks like a gears 1.5.

Killzone 2 was proclaimed before the first Gears of War was set free - what do you expect? Are you an ignorant person? At least, don't pretend to be one.

[QUOTE="Fondness"][QUOTE="Luxen90"]

It looks better than Gears 1 but not that much better. Looks like a very good game though.

Luxen90

Well, it's not easy to "crush" a game's graphics, that were completely fantastic two years ago, if it's being set free two years later.

What was the point of quoting me??

[QUOTE="AdrianWerner"][QUOTE="Mamba_Negra"]

heres the throne for the graphics KING!!

BAD ASS.

devious742

the king and his lackeys :D

LOL8)

:D

[QUOTE="blitzkid1"]

here ya go.

Tykain

Thanks for posting the pics. Not impressed so far, but waiting to see the vid. Still can't see it atm.

Yummy!

looks good, but didn't give me that epic chill on my skin. and altho there are more enemies on screen, from what i saw you still only fight 2-3 at a time (the 20 or so monsters that were on the mountain were like target shooting dummies...)kiwisama

If you would have fought 20, you would have died. In passing, seriously, is there any guy that thought that these graphics would transcend Crysis'?