Rockstar deserves to get shot for that. Not cool. Weird thing. Video game companies either seem to have some of the best work conditions, or the worst.
Turn 10? they achieved 92 with Forza 3..maybe 95 is possible with Forza 4.racing1750
Microsoft's devs (we consider naughty dog/insomniac, 2nd party devs, 1st party so same should be for ms's)
- Turn 10
- Lionhead
- Bungie
- 343 Industries
- Mistwalker
- Ruffian Games
- Wingnut Interactive
- Spawnpoint Studios
- Big Park
- Robot Ent.
Microsoft has some of the best devs in the industry and recently has bought BigPark and set up tons of developers.
Hmm...out of that bunch, the only notable company's are Lionhead (First party) and Bungie (Third party). 343 just came into conception, and it's only creation to date is Halo Waypoint. You forgot Epic Games by the way, as they seem to favor the Xbox 360. Well most of those are starting up. Mistwalker obviously does some great stuff. 343 will be making AAA titles eventually. Ruffian does Crackdown 2. Big Park is probably more for casual titles. Robot is starting up (ensemble revived- ironically MS funds the company.). Nobody knows what spawnpoint or wingnut is doing. And please, Rare makes great games. And turn 10 makes AAA racing games whic many like
Im happy with almost everything on that list except the open world structure. Games like Halo are great because of the set pieces. Those holy $**T moments. So thats a little disappointing.
[QUOTE="djsifer01"]Most likely never. MS just dose not have the first party derv talent to do so.racing1750
Turn 10? they achieved 92 with Forza 3..maybe 95 is possible with Forza 4. Microsoft's devs (we consider naughty dog/insomniac, 2nd party devs, 1st party so same should be for ms's)
- Turn 10
- Lionhead
- Bungie
- 343 Industries
- Mistwalker
- Ruffian Games
- Wingnut Interactive
- Spawnpoint Studios
- Big Park
- Robot Ent.
Microsoft has some of the best devs in the industry and recently has bought BigPark and set up tons of developers.
[QUOTE="GamerX2311"][QUOTE="RyoXX"] Hmm, yeah, possibly, I concur. Though the mentality of the industry was different at the time. Now every gaming website is scared **** of disappointing their fan basis. RyoXX
No, not necessarily. Unlike Ps3 game sites, you have such unqualified blog sites who are essentially halo haters on gamerankings. Well, that's arguable. The same would be said by PS3 fan boys, who believe every website that rates down a PS3 exclusive is biased towards the system. Halo 3 got a 5/10 from a website.... And lookie here. http://www.gamerankings.com/browse.html?site=&cat=0&year=0&numrev=3&sort=0&letter=&search=grand+theft+auto GTA4 ps3 rated one point higher. Games were identical. Pretty much how it goes. My favorite is Netjack- they said they didn't even play the multiplayer nor 1 and 2 yet complained about the story. Wow. Yet gamerankigns accepts the review. lol Look though- http://www.gamerankings.com/xbox360/926632-halo-3/articles.html The less reputable the site the lower the ranking. wowzers! Same with Devil May Cry http://www.gamerankings.com/browse.html?site=&cat=0&year=0&numrev=3&sort=0&letter=&search=devil+may+cry+4
Halo Reach has a chance, for this year at least, anytime Halo 3 got 94.
Hmm, yeah, possibly, I concur. Though the mentality of the industry was different at the time. Now every gaming website is scared **** of disappointing their fan basis. No, not necessarily. Unlike Ps3 game sites, you have such unqualified blog sites who are essentially halo haters on gamerankings.
No, because where as PS exclusive reviewers typically give 10/10s like candy, etc. , xbox 360 exclusive reviewers are much more strict. You have places like OXM who actually review for their readers and then many sights like netgamer who consider 5/10 the average, instead of 7. Notice how the multiplats which most places consider are slightly better on 360 are all rated better on ps3 at gamerankings? Yea, that's why we don't take that site seriously at all.
Notice how on individual sites the 360 gets higher AAAs.
Log in to comment