There's nothing wrong with the crystal system, I would just prefer to having multiple ways of getting somewhere, especially if they make the map Skyrim sized, walking would become tedious. Also mounts would bring an alternate approach to combat, using either a sword or bow on the mount would be interesting.

 

As for multiplayer, I suppose the easiest method to fix loot drops from bosses would be to give all players the same boss drop or give the player who dealt the most damage to the boss the rare drop and give everyone else the uncommon drops.

Battleguild

Yea the crystal system should stay, but there should be one in each major city, or at the minimum the two largest cities. Splitting the drops based on damage might not work, because if you think about it, there should be a level gap in the players you're allowed to invite, because sometimes there's not very much vocation specific pawns per-level, which means there will be even less players of your same level online at the same time as you. So, there will need to be a level gap, like say -/+10 levels you are for more availability, and the stronger they are the more likely they are to get the good drops most of the time.

I agree with most of it, and having at least one other player with you (online) would make it so much better, since the A.I can be annoyingly bad at times. I don't get how everyone seems to think loot sharing is impossible, simply give whoever didn't pick up the item the exact same thing as the player who picked it up. The visiting player can sell his loot or send it back to his bank. This next thing is a maybe, but perhaps there should be a teleport option to bring back the visiting player, in case he/she keeps running off.

I'm just hoping that they didn't make the pawns stupid to stop the game from becoming too easy, because that would mean they're directly against efficient killing machines, which a human player would be.

I might, sadly I can't check atm though. I'll get back to you.

I never finished it...

Duke Nukem N64

*Some time later*

Conkers Bad Fur Day N64

*Years later*

Conker: Live&Realoaded

*YEARS LATER*

Killzone 2

*Present day*

Random awesomeness.

I tried KINECT out at BestBuy, it feels realy goofy to use. Imma stick to my controller, whenever I get another 360..

Uhhhh no.Sp4rtan_3

None of those games are good? You could say the same thing about Crysis, WoW, Warhammer (any PC game)

[QUOTE="Ghostshell88"]

[QUOTE="coreybg"]

Don't make such bald statements unless you can back them up, which I'm pretty sure you can't.

A lot of PC gamers use a flatscreen setup, TVs aren't reserved for consoles.

A TV is like a monitor, if someone has a flatscreen TV in their room, I don't see why they wouldn't use it.

coreybg

Why I could say the same to you

"A lot of PC gamers use a flatscreen setup."

Can you back that up?

A lot of my friends who game on PC use a TV instead of a monitor.

I was talking from personal experience, you however, were talking from bias.

So when you say it it's experience, but when I say it it's biased? That statement is biased toward me.

[QUOTE="Ghostshell88"]

[QUOTE="coreybg"]

Don't make such bald statements unless you can back them up, which I'm pretty sure you can't.

A lot of PC gamers use a flatscreen setup, TVs aren't reserved for consoles.

A TV is like a monitor, if someone has a flatscreen TV in their room, I don't see why they wouldn't use it.

i5750at4Ghz

Why I could say the same to you

"A lot of PC gamers use a flatscreen setup."

Can you back that up?

Flatscreen TV's, duh!

[QUOTE="Ghostshell88"]

[QUOTE="i5750at4Ghz"] Yeah, because a monitor looks better yet costs less. Why I use a monitor for my console and PC gaming needs. But to answer your question, I setup a htpc for my mom on our 56 inch widescreen and its all she uses. Got rid of cable and everything.i5750at4Ghz

EXACTLY

I said theres a reason why they don't use flatscreens. Then I said EXACTLY.