Wow, SMH @ this situation.

*shrugs*

I got my copy, about to go play it in a few minutes.

[QUOTE="mtradr43"][QUOTE="DragonFlyJ"]Logically, if R2 offers more gameplay than R1, then it's should be conceived as a better game. Scores should represent that; therefore, R2 should receive at least 9.0. That's if it's a bug-free game.xxThyLordxx

agreed, there is no way, GS would score R2 9.0, if they do, I will leave GS for a month. 8.5 tops. though, I believe 8.0

After playing the beta I thought this game would get AAA across the board.

*shrugs*

Only negatives I've read about in reviews were about Insomniac taking the Weapon Wheel away :|

I didn't like it to begin with.

This might be a R&C all over again. But this time it will be about 10X more drastic. If they slap an 8 or a 7.5 on this one Sony and all of their fanboys will have a gigantic backlash against GS.

8.5 would be below my expectations and I was in the beta. But it's GS so 8.5 might be the highest it gets here.

Anybody think GS still has beef with Insomniac after the R&C review?

I put in like 150 hours into MGO. It's a fun game. I loved the first MGO on MGS3. This one pretty much improved on everything that one had to offer.

With that being said, the MGS4 MGO was a rip off and I'm very disappointed that they made gamers go through all the hoops just to register a name to play the game online. I guarantee plenty of gamers said forget this and didn't even bother going through that process.

And don't get me started with the expansion packs. If you have more than one person playing the game you have to buy the DLC twice. It doesn't just go to the console, it goes to the player's account which is even more proof that Konami's intent was to scam people with MGO.