This thread is making little sense to me... So what your trying to say is... you think PS1 games are part of the PS2 libary because PS2 is backwards compatible with PS1 games... So I guess then XBOX games are apart of XBOX360s libary... and nes, snes, genesis, N64 and GC games are part of the Wiis libary.... Erm what is the point of this thread again?Dahaka-UK

Exactly what I'm saying. However the 360 wasn't built to play ALL of the old Xbox1 games like the PS2 and PS3 were to play the previous consoles games. But none the less some Xbox1 games are a part of the 360's library.

Glad to see more people use common sense with the question.

[QUOTE="GoldenGlove"]

[QUOTE="JiveT"]You are on shaky ground there my friend. You could force the argument but I wouldn't risk it. You might end up regretting it for the rest of your life.JiveT

So do you agree with what I'm saying?

In spirit yes. I was the idiot that voted Yes in the poll. But if I took it to court I don't know what would happen.

In my opinion it's really common sense that the PS2's library consists of the PS1's as well. If they made the PS2 so that it only played PS2 games then of course you could say that they are separate libraries. But with the way it is now, the libraries are merged for you to play all the games on the PS2. It's really not that hard to see. Just like the PS3's library is PS3+PS2+PS1 games.

You are on shaky ground there my friend. You could force the argument but I wouldn't risk it. You might end up regretting it for the rest of your life.JiveT

So do you agree with what I'm saying?

ofcourse not, ps1 games are ps1 games, ps2 games are ps2 games, thats it. its like considering the Wii's virtual console games part of the Wii's library.thejakel11225

The Wii's virtual console games are a part of the Wii's library since you can play them with a Wii.

Hell no PS1 games = PS1 Libary

PS2 = PS2 Libary

PS3 = PS3 Libary.

SpecialForcesOp

A library is defined as a collection of things at your disposal to use. Sony made the PS2 with the PS1 in mind, so they made the console fully BC with all the PS1 games. So why shouldn't those games count as a part of PS2's library when you can play them all on one console?

I need some additional information from some gamers on here. I need to know if you feel like the PS2's game library consists of both the PS1 games and the PS2 titles.

The reason for this thread is for another board that I'm on. I made a thread asking which console has the best gaming library of all time. I picked the PS2 because you have all the PS1 games and PS2 games to choose from. But others say that it's not fair to say that. Am I wrong? So the PS1 games don't count toward the PS2's library? That's news to me.

[QUOTE="GoldenGlove"]

It's all poetry just delivered in a different way.

PSBox3SixWi

ah yes. i love those poems about slappin hoes. and the ones about cappin **** fo stealin my hoes and muh bills.

i also love how after they win an award for such "Poetry" they thank God, as if He condones the pimpin of hoes....

Okay, you generalizing all hiphop/rap like that is like me saying that all rock music embraces worshipping evil and suicide.  This is so ignorant.  Clearly you haven't heard any real hiphop artists.  Go pick up Lupe Fiasco's debut album.  He even rapped about skateboarding... far from talkin' about hoes.  

:lol: @ you lames actually agreeing with the threadstarter on this topic.  Why shouldn't there be variety?  Just because you don't listen to hiphop don't mean I don't.  Why wouldn't EA put hiphop in Madden?  Or Fight Night... or NBA Live... or Need for Speed?  All of those games are damn near a part of hiphop culture.  I didn't b!tch when I played DMC3 through all that corny ass music, I just realized that the game is targeted for a different demographic. 

And there is a difference between rap and hiphop.  None the less don't call a whole genre crap.  I don't listen to a lot of different types of music.  It's all poetry just delivered in a different way.  Whether it be rap, rock, pop, r&b, or hiphop.  Don't hate on what you don't understand.

[QUOTE="GoldenGlove"]

Just think about that.

The Wii costs 249 for slightly better visuals than last gen. If Sony were to release a Wiimote type controller for the PS2... not PS3, but PS2 then Nintendo would be as good as gone. PS2 still sales like crazy and that would even boost sales more. They could just make cheesy party games and something like, "Playstation Sports" and grab a lot of potential Wii buyers.

PS2 >>> Wii in terms of games and multimedia. Can you play CDs on Wii? How bout DVDs?

frodnekcod

patents ftw? Also, everyone would notice the blatant ripoff, and it wouldnt halt wii sales, how would it grab potential wii buyers if its the same thing? Also, PS2 has been out for 6 years, so right now it has better game selection, doesnt take a genius to figure that out. And, i have a DVD player and an Ipod, i have no need for multimedia on my GAMING console.

I'm sure Sony can make something to resemble it without breaking the law.  Some of you people are so naive.