HULKMANIA_001's forum posts

Avatar image for HULKMANIA_001
HULKMANIA_001

251

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 HULKMANIA_001
Member since 2003 • 251 Posts

[QUOTE="HULKMANIA_001"]And FF caliber, what i think means is that how EVERY FF game has brought something new to the table and makes the genre feel FRESH unlike LO which is a rinse and repeat with some minor tweaks. Vandalvideo
Every Final fantasy hardly brings anything new to the table. Final Fantasy is the perennial underachiever of the JRPG genre, relying on the innovations of better franchises like Suikoden, Shadow Hearts, and Star Ocean for their successes. Final Fantasy isn't without merits. It single handedly brought the genre into the mainstream, but it is far from the best franchise out there int he genre. I've played practically every last JRPG known to man, even those that don't have english translations like Linda Cubed which has one of, if not the best story in any JRPG every created. I can honestly say that there is only one FF game in my top 20.



FF7 brought cinematic story telling into the genre, FF8 brought in a fully customizable(yet broken) leveling system at the time, FFX expanded on the cinematic story telling by adding voice acting, and FF12 brought in a MMORPG ****battle system which i believe works flawlessly and will become the norm for JRPG's to come, albeit not to the same extent but something similar will be in place in FF13. And above all this FF's have had memorable sound tracks-characters(for the most part) and themes and because each one is drastically different from the other each FF is able to keep a fresh feel to them. Keep in mindIve only menthioned the FF's from the PS era and not before, the ones before were what saved JRPG fromdying so i think thats merits alone for them to be considered innovative.

Now im not saying that you are wrong because it is evident you have much more JRPG experience behind the belt than me, im just trying to expand on my point and give reason.

Avatar image for HULKMANIA_001
HULKMANIA_001

251

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 HULKMANIA_001
Member since 2003 • 251 Posts
[QUOTE="TenP"]

[QUOTE="darklord888"]PC = King of casual, MMO, RTS
360 = King of FPS, JRPG, RPG
darklord888

Ya lost me there...



It's a toss up between 360 and PC. Currently I'd pick 360(although I haven't played Crysis yet). I'm not counting controls or anything here, just games.



PC has much more than just Crysis..

And I feel 360 is KING of sport games and Shooters(Bioshock, Gears,Halo are all highly respected games in that specific Genre.)
Ps3 is king of Action games (MGS4 and Uncharted are by far the best action games to date this gen.) I know it might not have many of them right now though
and Wii is King of Platformers,Casual/minigames.
Avatar image for HULKMANIA_001
HULKMANIA_001

251

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 HULKMANIA_001
Member since 2003 • 251 Posts

[QUOTE="HAZE-Unit"]But the game was not a FF caliber, thats why he is still wrong, if it was a superb game it would have gotten a AAA status regardless of names, it is bad logic.BioShockOwnz

Errr, an opinion is not fact. Not my opinion or Gamespots opinion, or even your opinion. I was stating my opinion. Lost Odyssey is better than FFXII, yet scored below it. :(

Like supermechakirbysays, were talking about JRPG's THIS generation. FFXII was a last generation PS2 game and still I believe the battle system in that game is superior to LO.

And FF caliber, what i think means is that how EVERY FF game has brought something new to the table and makes the genre feel FRESH unlike LO which is a rinse and repeat with some minor tweaks.

Avatar image for HULKMANIA_001
HULKMANIA_001

251

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 HULKMANIA_001
Member since 2003 • 251 Posts
im glad you find my remark funny, I just really dont have the time to always be ontop of the latest news in gaming like you guys.
Avatar image for HULKMANIA_001
HULKMANIA_001

251

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 HULKMANIA_001
Member since 2003 • 251 Posts

[QUOTE="HULKMANIA_001"]Wait a second, are u telling me trophy support has already been patched for Uncharted or are you talking about the medals?realistic44

trophy support is already patched for uncharted.

If so i have a reason to take a break from SCIV and do an uncharted run.

Avatar image for HULKMANIA_001
HULKMANIA_001

251

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 HULKMANIA_001
Member since 2003 • 251 Posts
Wait a second, are u telling me trophy support has already been patched for Uncharted or are you talking about the medals?
Avatar image for HULKMANIA_001
HULKMANIA_001

251

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 HULKMANIA_001
Member since 2003 • 251 Posts

[QUOTE="Angakua"]just shows how desperate they are...Sonick54

sex sells my friend

So do good videogames.

Avatar image for HULKMANIA_001
HULKMANIA_001

251

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 HULKMANIA_001
Member since 2003 • 251 Posts
[QUOTE="Gamerman12362"]

In the end, it's only good for the 360. Not bad for Ps3 owners.

It's a bigger blow to the pc and wii if anything.

X_CAPCOM_X



It's bad for PS3 owners. Because this game will be available for the 360 in North America (where the PS3 is not doing it's best), the PS3 will not sell as many units as it could have. This decrease in potential userbase decreases game sales, which obviously decreases development and the amount of money Sony has to work with for the PS3. This also decreases the amount of people online.

Thats a longshot dont you think? IF i recall GTA4 managed to sell well on the PS3

Avatar image for HULKMANIA_001
HULKMANIA_001

251

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 HULKMANIA_001
Member since 2003 • 251 Posts

[QUOTE="HULKMANIA_001"][QUOTE="Gamerman12362"]Who cares? REMAKES SUCK, Gamerman12362



Ninja gaiden was a remake. that didnt suck? Anyways it depends on the sucess of FFXIII on the 360. If it is sucessful expect the same to happen with FFVII and all future FF's.

No, Sigma sucked. I played the same game. It was good for people who didn't play it, but how about those who did? Why not just make a new game? FF7 would need to be completely redone now.

In my opinion, FF13 looks better than FF7. Besides, do you really want to see cloud metrified?

Havent we already in Advent Children lol

Avatar image for HULKMANIA_001
HULKMANIA_001

251

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 HULKMANIA_001
Member since 2003 • 251 Posts

While it is a big blow to the PS3, I don't think it's a big blow to Sony. Sony owns 22% of Square Enix, so when Final Fantasy XIII sells on the 360 for 60 dollars, the game vendor gets 10 dollars. Microsoft then takes their 10% royalty on 360 games... 5 dollars. 45 Dollars remain, and Sony gets 22% of that, giving them around 10 dollars. It's funny when you think about it, that a 360 game selling will help Sony.

As a primary shareholder of Square-Enix, Sony is involved in the decision making process. They probably own more stock in the company than does the President and CEO of Square-Enix, Yoichi Wada. My only guess is that Sony doesn't want the PS3 to sell yet because of how expensive it is to make. They lose money on every PS3 sold. It's crazy, but Sony will actually be better off if they don't sell PS3's...

AmyMizuno


I highly doubt they don t want PS3's sold, also i believe sony is already making a profit on the PS3's now(primarily the 40GB). The reason Sony is able to drive costs down for their hardware is because sony in general is a hardware manufacturing company, they have alot of factories they own that could probably produce PS3 parts as opposed to micro which is more of a software company and needs to outsource to different companies to make its hardware.