What evidence do you have to support the idea that blood type and masculine personality are causally related? Testosterone is positively associated with status-seeking, domineering behavior, but a positive association is not a causative relationship. Correlation doesn't imply causation. So, until it can be proven that higher testosterone necessitates more masculinity, I will not believe so easily that masculinity is 100% innate. Gender norms are largely (though possibly not entirely) a product of culture. Don't get me wrong; there's nothing wrong with being normally masculine. It's just that alpha-male masculinity is absolutely silly.Let's see the main difference between a male and a female.[QUOTE="ghoklebutter"][QUOTE="funtimez12345"]Okay, that's not true at all. Go test the blood of a "beta" then go test the blood of an "alpha" then get back to me.
funtimez12345
Masculinity-
-obvious physical differences ;bolder more dominant attitude (and don't give me that BS that gender attitudes are completely society enforced. Dominance in males is a natural thing)
Feminimity
-obviousy physical differences ;submissive attitude
Now onto the homonal differences between males and females. Males have more test and less estrogen. Females have more estrogen and less testosterone
Now do you think there is a reason typical "alphas" are the buff, dominant football playing types? Do you think there is a reason betas are the weaker, meeker, more submissive types?
It's plain as day to me.
He who argues with google, Doth not argue at all.
Log in to comment