[QUOTE="topsemag55"]Hmm...Level 1, 3 posts. Consoles will never match PC performance due to poor case design and bad heat dissipation. They also have to gimp their chips due to heat. Not here to troll...
You think Crysis 1 looks better than Crysis 2 gives me the impression you have no idea what you're talking about and do not have a PC capable of playing the game.
-Unreal-
Actually I own 2xEVGA gtx480 and everything was maxed out even with the patch. It looked not even close to crysis 1. They added a lot of Bloom lighting to hide the terrible ttextures. Perhaps it is you who needs to get your eyes checked. And yes I own a 24" monitor and run the game at 1920*1200 Crysis 2 looks better than Crysis 1. If you do have that PC, you're just plain lying. But we could already gather that from your opening post anyway. O'really? http://images.bit-tech.net/content_images/2011/03/crysis-2-pc-review/crysis2_water_h.jpg vs http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/403/joo1.jpg/ I've compared the two. Not only is the water disgusting but the textures are worse too...
You think Crysis 1 looks better than Crysis 2 gives me the impression you have no idea what you're talking about and do not have a PC capable of playing the game.
-Unreal-
Actually I own 2xEVGA gtx480 and everything was maxed out even with the patch. It looked not even close to crysis 1. They added a lot of Bloom lighting to hide the terrible ttextures. Perhaps it is you who needs to get your eyes checked. And yes I own a 24" monitor and run the game at 1920*1200
It is clear that next generation is around the corner. Whilst some say that PC gaming is far from dead. However, what type of PC gaming are people talking about? From my recollection, there haven't been that many games that actually challenge high end PC gaming.Those that have are A) Poorly optimized or terrible console ports. Hell...there has yet to be a game that surpasses the visual quality of the awesome 2007 PC title crysis 1.Not even it's successor(crysis 2) comes even close to the visual awesomeness of crysis 1). Some say that with the high res texture packs it makes a difference but I beg to differ. I've bought crysis 2 on PC with the direct x11 patch and It felt like a 2-3 notches down from it's predecessor. In contrast, PC gaming is becoming more indie, and the casual market is thriving with facebook and failville games taking over the platform.Not to say that games don't look better but we haven't seen a game that looks better than crysis1. Whilst gaming maybe just about fun, I hate to play games with bad polygons and strain the eye. It's like watching stuff in 1080p vs VHS quality;the experience is just not the same. For those who say, you should just game for "fun" factor. Well I am sorry but the whole point of upgrading to the newer graphics card is because you get better frame-rate and you assume that you'd get better visuals but PC gamers haven't seen that. I fear that the way developers/manufacturers will resort to cheap tactics such as providing poor driver support or developers purposely making the game unnecessarily resource intensive. Will next generation consoles be where all the hardcore gamers will go? I am sorry but I don't view minecraft as a true hardcore "PC game". It's more suited towards the casual market and frankly I yawn at it. This is on personal preference and my gaming preferences have changed over the years I've gamed for. Discuss.
Log in to comment