Sorry Halo fans, Halo 3 isn't 1/10th the game KZ2 is, and nothing shown so far makes Reach come anywhere close to KZ2 let alone KZ3. Halo 3 is a slow uninspired, stuck in the past generic FPS. KZ is a modern masterpiece. KZ2 won BEST COMPETITIVE MP. ODST Wasn't even nominated and barely scraped a AA score by the press. GamingZuru

[QUOTE="Sp4rtan_3"][QUOTE="nervmeister"] KZ2's controls, despite their unorthodox design, are far from clunky. And as much as you may hate to admit it, Halo is every bit as "generic" as Killzone. And no, a fancy map editor isn't going to change thatxYamatox

Halo's story and Universe made it VERY cliche for me. It's basic sci-fi setting. I worked in a book prcessing plant for a few years, and we would get art books for art colleges all the time, and everything that's in Halo has been done before, only 10x better. Heck, even the Ring-World idea was already done many years ago.

Now, I'm not saying Killzone is any less generic when it comes to it's universe, but no one is trying to say it's original in any way.

[QUOTE="MushroomWig"][QUOTE="tehsystemwarior"]Control Limitation.tume-x

[QUOTE="IAMSERIAL"]Exactly how many of those games can ONLY be done and played on pc? Some of those games are even from last gen.Arach666

[QUOTE="IAMSERIAL"]The graphical differences are so minimal between console and pc. It's nothing like HL2 vs last gen console graphics.mitu123

[QUOTE="IAMSERIAL"] Nobody is backpedaling. PC graphic differences are too minimal these days to give a rats ass about.lundy86_4

You didn't state multiplats in your initial point, and then included it after I stated about running Metro2033/Crysis on max details at a res above 1080p.

You also didn't answer my question about whether you played either of those games at max settings. So, did you?