The PS3 will be the console graphics king at the end of this generation we've elready seen alittle glimpse of it. That being said won't leaps and bounds ahead ahead of the 360 just slightly and this only applies to exclusives.Flamestos

Thank you for responding to my OP. But what "gimpse" are you talking about? I see nothing that couldn't be done on the 360.

[QUOTE="Solid_Tekken"]

I agree that PS3 and 360 are roughy equal in terms of graphics but your point on multi-plat titles doesn't hold ground, I mean if the game is created on 360 and ported to PS3 it will look slightly better on 360 and vice-versa. Keep in mind the developers have had much more time on the 360 due to it being out much earlier plus it's familier architecture. PS3 came out later and is harder to develop for yet the games are quite similar amongst the 2 consoles. This kinda shows that despite the problems posed by the PS3 the graphics are still similar to 360 multi-plat wise. Just look at the PS2, a console which like the PS3 was hard to program on yet look how that turned out, PS3 has alot of power and you will gradually see that year after year, like the PS2.

Steppy_76

What about the PS2, most of its games looked inferior in 2001, and most of its games looked inferior in 2005. EVERY console continues to see improvements year after year(which is why the PS2 never caught the xbox despite getting better over time....the xbox wasn't a stationary target).

Cows have to learn to realize Sony machines are what they are. For 3 generations in a row we've heard claims of hardware superiority and unlocked potential to propel it past other machines, and they have NEVER met those claims, as their competition has always improved over time as well.

The PS3 and the 360 are pretty much equivilent in power...the specs suggested that in 2005, and 2006-2008 continue to display exactly that.

Lots of excellent points here. Cows would be benefitted by heeding these words. There is simply zero evidence that the PS3 is somehow vastly more powerful than the 360. It's a good thing we can use other measures of a console's worth, like game libaries and AAAEs.

[QUOTE="IDateWhiteChick"][QUOTE="skirlnik"]

Shouldn't you be using your supposed education for something better than this?

Can I get a mod in here?

skirlnik

Typical cow response- report a thread that is 100% true to the mods, because you don't like what was written. Afraid of the truth?

Actually, I was messing with you. Like you're messing with people you don't know. I didn't report the thread or anything - why should I care what your opinion is in System Wars? You come on here every day making threads full of assumptions about some supposed "herd" of people that all think the same thing like some gigantic hive-mind. You're the definition of "don't assume, it makes an *ss of you and me," and I only posted to call you out on it.

Thanks for using pejorative to ostracize a group of people who don't think like you, though. Everyone really appreciates that.

you're just afraid of the truth

what does pejorative mean

[QUOTE="IDateWhiteChick"]the PS3 is not the same as the PS2, and never will be.

Solid_Tekken

Sales-wise it may not but game-wise I reckon it definitely will before this gen is over.

You can't be serious

I agree that PS3 and 360 are roughy equal in terms of graphics but your point on multi-plat titles doesn't hold ground, I mean if the game is created on 360 and ported to PS3 it will look slightly better on 360 and vice-versa. Keep in mind the developers have had much more time on the 360 due to it being out much earlier plus it's familier architecture. PS3 came out later and is harder to develop for yet the games are quite similar amongst the 2 consoles. This kinda shows that despite the problems posed by the PS3 the graphics are still similar to 360 multi-plat wise. Just look at the PS2, a console which like the PS3 was hard to program on yet look how that turned out, PS3 has alot of power and you will gradually see that year after year, like the PS2.

Solid_Tekken

Sure, but do you really think that the PS3 will vastly outpace the 360, graphically? What's likely to happen is a game of leap frog between the two consoles, with one getting a "best grraphiks evah" game, and then a couple months later another game is released on the other console with is arguably better. And so on. But the PS3 will never completely outclass the 360, at least not before the next generation.

Also, the PS3 is not the same as the PS2, and never will be.

[QUOTE="black_awpN1"][QUOTE="IDateWhiteChick"]

[QUOTE="Dunkaman"]killzone 2 and mgs4 say OMGHI2Uxsubtownerx

Are you trying to say that neither could be done on the 360? ;)

THey could, but ethy would be Downgrades becasue ofDisc Space.

That's a myth. You'd be surprised how much smaller files get when you compress them. ;)

True. Just another myth that cows like to spout off. Blu ray really has no real advantage for gaming. Why do massive PC games still use dvd, and even cd?

You obvously know alot about the graphics since you own a PS3. :roll:Lionheart08

Actually, I read ign and gamesspot, and like one of my friends owns a PS3 (and everyone else owns 360s). i have played it

killzone 2 and mgs4 say OMGHI2UDunkaman

Are you trying to say that neither could be done on the 360? ;)

Shouldn't you be using your supposed education for something better than this?

Can I get a mod in here?

skirlnik

Typical cow response- report a thread that is 100% true to the mods, because you don't like what was written. Afraid of the truth?