[QUOTE="Bgrngod"]

[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"][QUOTE="walton13"]yeah because we all know we have 2,000 dollar computers that can handle this game. I just threw my PS3 out the window, my 360 is next...hamumu

A little bit of B and a little bit of S in the same post.

It could run maxed, but it depends on how your monitor is.

If the monitor was 1024X768, then you could run it maxed.

You are under estimating Crysis 

[QUOTE="walton13"]yeah because we all know we have 2,000 dollar computers that can handle this game. I just threw my PS3 out the window, my 360 is next...foxhound_fox

 I would like to see that, the GPU alone will be close to $800, I dont think anything else will be able to run it at max, I could be wrong but $1000 PCs can be good i fyou know what your doing, I just dont hink it will max out crysis.

[QUOTE="Gears360"]so far Zelda Jaggies Princess come on, the thing is a ripoff of OOT with extremely dated presentation, but sheep treat it like its the second coming of chrsit or somethingsuper_mario_128

Love how just because he dislikes Zelda you automatically start bashing GeoW assuming that he is a lemming GeoW lover. There is such a thing as a opinion and he has a valid point. 

This game will in no small measure flop but high AAA is a little bit of a long shot. I am by no way saying the game will be bad but just not AAA. My reasoning is just that the Alpha footage didnt impress me that much. I realize that is Alpha and they are already in late Beta by now but the gameplay didnt amaze me enought for AAA. All I am saying is calm down an dont get to hyped up for an AAA score. You can call me a lemming if you must but that doesnt change the fact that I dont feel the game worthy of 9.5+, it feels more like 8.3 to 8.6. The problem is its alpha footage and its actually very difficult to judge, but even after the graphics are improved it doesnt feel like AAA.

 I hope you the best that your not dissapointed by the game but relying on silly numbers to justify your purchase isint needed, whether the game gets a 8.0 or 9.5 as long aas you love the game it shouldnt matter. However if you feel scores are very important remember AA is still very good and should not make you think the game is a failure

[QUOTE="Blackbond"][QUOTE="SolidTy"][QUOTE="Kev_Unreal"]

[QUOTE="SolidTy"]Good for Nintendo, Good for Nintendo Fans, and Good for Wii Owners, but not necessarily good for HARDCORE gamers. SolidTy

Define hardcore gamers?

I went back and edited, again, I just played Wii Play with some friends today, and Love my Wii, but so far that's what I feel. Still, I can't wait for SSBB, Metroid, Mario Galaxy, etc.

Still finishing up the GC-fun-Port Super Paper Mario as we speak (With me lady).

So I guess you won't be playing Heavenly Sword because its an Xbox Port? I guess nobody will be playing Too Human because its a PS1 and Gameube port?

LOL. Nice try, but those are going to be radically different and GRAPHICALLY ENHANCED, like Kameo, before I get my mits on them. Nintendo is the only company I know that could cancel a game for one system, and release it on the next gen system, and get defended even though the game is graphically the same as it was before (Zelda, Paper Mario).

Imagine if Sony cancelled God of War II LAST MINUTE, and released it on PS3, with the same graphics, although they added Motion control with SIXAXIS? LOL.

Anyways, I digress, I did buy Super Paper Mario, so obviously the quick answer is yes, I would still play Too Huma and Heavenly Sword, EVEN IF THEY WERE THE SAME...but they won't be. Only Nintendo could get away with that. It's okay though, Paper Mario is great, except for the lack of Voice Acting(C'mon Nintendo, pay for voice actor's already), andthe lack of a run button.

To reiterate, Yes, I do play ports, all the time, But I do like to mention they are ports (LOL. Kameo N64 port, snicker.)

Actually they did improve the graphics according to the hardware, the problem is the hardware is 90% gamecube clone so there is very little they could have done more. If your looking at a wii your someone that doesnt care about graphics but instead gamesplay.

 I dont want to bash the wii but you need to know what you get, dont expect next gen graphics from the wii expect gameplay. I love my wii but I would scratch my eyes out if I didnt have either a PS3 or 360 because Nintendo doesnt care for hardcore gamers they are after the casual crowd. Their is nothing wrong with that but having only casual games can get very irritating so I I balance in alot of GeoW. That is the reason the wii cant dominate this generation, it doesnt give alot of gamers everything they want from games. I think the wii might win in sales but will be followed closely by the other two. 

 Now the sheep in me just wants to restate that the most important thing in games are gameplay so dont let the bad graphics not get you a wii. If you not getting a wii make the reason the games dont appeal to you. I hate people who say games are fun but ugly and give that as a reason to not like the game. If that is how you feel youa re missing out on alot of fun.