Ishdul's forum posts
1998: Grim Fandango
1999: Rayman 2: The Great Escape
2000: Baldur's Gate II: Shadows of Amn
2001: Metal Gear Solid 2: Sons of Liberty
2002: Virtua Fighter 4
2003: Dark Cloud 2
2004: Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas
2005: Resident Evil 4
2006: Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess
2007: Super Mario Galaxy
1. Considering Halo 3's sales you shouldn't say they ''wasted'' money on advertising.
2. SMG spent well more than a few thousand on advertising.
3. Neither one is done selling.
thats tooo high of a score imo. it shud be around 7.5ishgongytron
You've played it?
Anyways, good but not great score, can't imagine it hitting a 9.0 on GameSpot.
You listed two games for Medal of Honor.
Soul Calibur.
Without having played Tools of Destruction...
1. The complaint about variety isn't necessarily wrong. The complaint wouldn't be so much with the variety but with the de-emphasis of the strong core gameplay to focus on weak secondary gameplay. Sonic Adventure 2 was pretty much the perfect example of this, where the effort to expand the gameplay hurt it majorly.
2. Anyone using the ''last gen gameplay with next gen graphics'' line needs to stop.
3. I hope that the notion that GameSpot backs the review has to do with GameSpot agreeing with the review. If their was a consensus of agreement that R&C was a 7.5 game and Aaron was simply the guy who typed up the review then there's no problem. If there wasn't any agreement and Aaron just went lone wolf for the review with GameSpot backing him up because he's one of their own or because the last thing they need is to have another reviewer thrown under the bus then Schneider's point is entirely valid.
Log in to comment