Spurs fans will always be haunted by this
Jagged3dge's forum posts
I thought it was a mixture of genius and boredom :lol:
The story is what really kept me going cause the gameplay got kinda stale midway through, a feeling I never had with the other Bioshock's gameplay. I ended up playing the game in fragments since I would lose interest if I played for long sessions (I've noticed this recent trend with a lot of new games though, a bit depressing).
Nevertheless, I thought the game was really well done and I plan on playing through it again on 1999 mode in the near future.
[QUOTE="theone86"]
You admit that James is a dumb clod who couldn't cut it in college, good to know.
You say basketball is a team sport, but then you say Lebron carried the team on his back, which one is it? Even if I do accept that, Lebron was the one who disappeared in the postseason, not his teammates.
Jordan was great at getting his team involved and Lebron is a ballhog, there's no comparison there. Jordan could also defend as well, he was a better blocker than James because he was more athletic.
Jazz_Fan
what are you doing
Exposing his ignorance.
This might make Hablo cream himself:
Chandler Parsons has been recruiting Dwight Howard to sign with the Houston Rockets.
"I talk to Dwight every day, Parsons said. Ive created a relationship with him where I feel like were very close. He hits me up about everything. Ive covered pretty much every question hes had. I basically tell him We have a chance to be really good without you next year. Were going to have a good season. Why not come and join us, join our core guys that are for sure be here and make great, make us contend for a championship?"
"Thats the main point Ive got from talking to him. He wants to win. He wants to win rings. Its obvious there is no better fit, no better team or opportunity to do that than with us."
Parsons sent Howard a text after watching the Miami Heat celebrate their NBA championship win over the Spurs.
"After watching that last night", Parsons said, "I hit him with, Come to Houston. That could be us."
"Jordan was great at getting his team involved and Lebron is a ballhog, there's no comparison there. Jordan could also defend as well, he was a better blocker than James because he was more athletic."
OT talking sports
[QUOTE="Jagged3dge"]
[QUOTE="theone86"]
Yeah, because Jordan actually went to college, and it definitely shows. How many years did James spend on the Cavs without winning the big one? How many times did he choke in clutch situations? Given the same span of time in their respective careers Jordan is FAR more accomplished. After ten years in the league Jordan had won three championships in a row, after three more years he had won six. Lebron's got a long way to go if he wants to be as good as Jordan at winning championships. Not to mention that anyone can watch the two play taking championships and awards out of the discussion for a moment and see that Jordan had a more complete game.
theone86
I'll reiterate this before I even respond to you.. I think it's stupid comparing legends to active players when they're still writing their legacy. In addition, I think its stupid putting players up against each other that play two different positions and have vastly different games. A Kobe vs MJ comparison makes a whole lot of sense, this one is baseless though.
Anyway, yes Jordan did go to college while LeBron went straight into the league. Which is why it took him a bit longer to develop his game to the NBA elite level, but that only illustrates just how great of a player LBJ is because he's been a dominate player in the league over pretty much the span of his career. Despite not having the guidance that comes from playing at the college level and helping your game to translate smoothly.
James carried a Cavs team with the second best players being MO WILLIAMS AND VAREJAO to the NBA Finals practically on his back. And ran into a superior Spurs squad that forced LeBron's teammates to beat him instead. And surprise surprise, they didn't show up. It's a team game after all, nobody wins a championship by themselves.
I strongly disagree that Jordan had a more complete game. I can definitely say at this point Jordan was a better scorer. But LeBron is a walking triple double. He can rebound, get his team involved like a Magic Johnson, and shut down the opposing players. Which brings me to my next point, he can guard positions 1-5. There's never been a guy in the league that could do that. He held Tony Parker scoreless at the end of game 7, while dominating offensively. How can you shrug that off as not impressive.
You admit that James is a dumb clod who couldn't cut it in college, good to know.
You say basketball is a team sport, but then you say Lebron carried the team on his back, which one is it? Even if I do accept that, Lebron was the one who disappeared in the postseason, not his teammates.
Jordan was great at getting his team involved and Lebron is a ballhog, there's no comparison there. Jordan could also defend as well, he was a better blocker than James because he was more athletic.
No, I didn't admit that at all. I guess you can put words in my mouth though if you desperately need to make your pathetic point.
It appears you don't know too much about the game of basketball so let me educate you a little bit... That system they had in Cleveland was all about LeBron being the man. If he struggled at all there wouldn't be any player to help with the burden. Instead the team was surround with jump shooters who really were incapable of even creating their own shot. LeBron had to be aggressive in that system because he really couldn't count on his teammates to win games for him. Coach Pop of the Spurs knew this and so they doubled and even tripled teamed him in that Finals. The Finals is quite a rigorous stage because at that point it takes a complete team effort to win. The teams are usually evenly matched and the margin of error is so tiny. Its when all a team's flaws surface.
LeBron is a ballhog? I'm not even going to bother with that nonsensical claim, actually I'm not touching the rest of that argument because I know its BS. :lol:
Oh man its both funny and sad talking sports with OT..
Yeah, because Jordan actually went to college, and it definitely shows. How many years did James spend on the Cavs without winning the big one? How many times did he choke in clutch situations? Given the same span of time in their respective careers Jordan is FAR more accomplished. After ten years in the league Jordan had won three championships in a row, after three more years he had won six. Lebron's got a long way to go if he wants to be as good as Jordan at winning championships. Not to mention that anyone can watch the two play taking championships and awards out of the discussion for a moment and see that Jordan had a more complete game.
theone86
I'll reiterate this before I even respond to you.. I think it's stupid comparing legends to active players when they're still writing their legacy. In addition, I think its stupid putting players up against each other that play two different positions and have vastly different games. A Kobe vs MJ comparison makes a whole lot of sense, this one is baseless though.
Anyway, yes Jordan did go to college while LeBron went straight into the league. Which is why it took him a bit longer to develop his game to the NBA elite level, but that only illustrates just how great of a player LBJ is because he's been a dominate player in the league over pretty much the span of his career. Despite not having the guidance that comes from playing at the college level and helping your game to translate smoothly.
James carried a Cavs team with the second best players being MO WILLIAMS AND VAREJAO to the NBA Finals practically on his back. And ran into a superior Spurs squad that forced LeBron's teammates to beat him instead. And surprise surprise, they didn't show up. It's a team game after all, nobody wins a championship by themselves.
I strongly disagree that Jordan had a more complete game. I can definitely say at this point Jordan was a better scorer. But LeBron is a walking triple double. He can rebound, get his team involved like a Magic Johnson, kill you in the low post, as you saw in game 7 he's expanded his shot to just about anywhere on the court, all while being able to shut down the opposing players. Which brings me to my next point, he can guard positions 1-5. There's never been a guy in the league that could do that. He held Tony Parker scoreless at the end of game 7, while dominating offensively. How can you shrug that off as not impressive.
Log in to comment