I pay attention to reviews all the time. Except for GS reviews - they tend to give everything that isn't mainstream lower than the norm. But with all the AA and AAA titles that come out every year, I don't really have time for titles that don't receive higher scores. Not to say anything below an 8.0 is bad, but there's only so many hours in the day for playing games.
Couldn't have cared less about this game when it was revealed at E3, but I've been hyped up about it ever since I saw the extensive track editor. I'm predicting 8.5 here.
How is halo milked explain that? And whats with the Halo hate? It's the greatest fps series IMO. I put more hours into it that any other series.gammon56
Three Halo games in the space of 3 years. I'm not questioning its quality but really do we need another Halo game already? We don't exactly have a shortage of FPSs at the moment.
Surprisingly, none. As I always consult reviews before buying, I very rarely purchase a poor game. I was a little disappointed with Smackdown vs. Raw 2010 but it was still a decent game. I hadn't bought a wrestling game in a while, so I was expecting some improvements over the PS2 versions. Turns out the game was exactly the same as before.
Log in to comment