[QUOTE="Bansheesdie"]

[QUOTE="GermanShepard06"]ignoring the geow pic much?GermanShepard06

Look at the rocket launcher, and then compare it to the Lancer in Gears and then tell us what you think of the two. Try to keep the filler to a minimum if you please.

dude, if u think geow looks better in those pics then u really need to get ur eyes checked.

In thoes pics? Find some DECENT pictures for once.

Or look at the 2 games actually in game and running.

then come back to me.

GeOW looks tons better than RFOM

Or is every respectable source wrong?

Along with all the awards given to GeOW?

explain that please. 

[QUOTE="SemiMaster"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"][QUOTE="SemiMaster"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"][QUOTE="Huxley_00"]

Don't feed the troll people!

He's just trying to get attention!

GermanShepard06

or maybe u just want the other lemmings to remain brainwashed cuz u know im right.

u know that today every x360 game should look just as good as geow if not better, but they arent.

If the PS3 is superior, then every PS3 game should look better than Gears. Sit down, kid.

rofl, gears came out a year later after the x360's release, soo when did ps3 come out again?

self-owned.

u know damn well that ps3 is going to have games coming out this year that are going to destroy geow in the graphics department. And thats's with 1000 enemies on screen at once and not just four like in geow.

Doesn't matter, does the PS3 have a better looking game than Gears? No, you need to sit down before you own yourself again.

it appears that u were fooled by the NA media and websites.

so how do u explain the 40player online? better animations? better sound? better AI, better physics? all that over geow.

GeOW wanted to be 4 vs 4 they wanted a close relationship between players and wanted it to be based on teamwork and cooperation. Better Animations? I don't see any difference... Each game has different animations because you know, THEY ARE DIFFERENT GAMES. Better Sound? hahahaha. Better AI? Have you even played gears before? GeOW didn't focus on physics but gameplay. 

GeOW is better than RFOM, get over it.  

[QUOTE="SemiMaster"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"][QUOTE="Huxley_00"]

Don't feed the troll people!

He's just trying to get attention!

GermanShepard06

or maybe u just want the other lemmings to remain brainwashed cuz u know im right.

u know that today every x360 game should look just as good as geow if not better, but they arent.

If the PS3 is superior, then every PS3 game should look better than Gears. Sit down, kid.

rofl, gears came out a year later after the x360's release, soo when did ps3 come out again?

self-owned.

u know damn well that ps3 is going to have games coming out this year that are going to destroy geow in the graphics department. And thats's with 1000 enemies on screen at once and not just four like in geow.

What you said about GeOW was AMAZINGLY irrelevant.

Gears wasn't made to have 24756204576234 enemies on screen, it was a 3rd person shooter in closed areas, they made the game that way on purpose, and whadaya know it did amazingly well with out 2340324 enemies on screen at a time.

360 would do a better job at producing more enemies on screen anyways.  

[QUOTE="Huxley_00"]

Don't feed the troll people!

He's just trying to get attention!

GermanShepard06

or maybe u just want the other lemmings to remain brainwashed cuz u know im right.

u know that every x360 game today should look just as good as geow if not better, but they arent. And u also know that MS aint going to give devs the extra millions they need to spend on programming.

hahaha dude, german shepard has been royally owned just in the first page on this thread alone.

Misquotes (which is illegal by the way) no link, not only misquoting but also adding your own words and opinions to it.

I'd give up right now man. 

[QUOTE="GsSanAndreas"]its actually harder developing for the ps3.GermanShepard06

not when ur working from ground up, the power is there, no need to spend extra millions on programmers to access extra power like geow had to do.

Team ninja, factor5, square, konami > you

hahaha using 4 MAIN PS3 dev's opinion.

Well good thing that is a valid opinion, and totally un-biased.

And I'm pretty sure I havn't heard of a conferance where all thoes devs got together and decided that THE 360 IS TOO HARD TO DEVELOPE FOR!!!! ;( 

Factor5 said it, x360 hardware is such a nightmare to work with that when porting an engine to a different console it would be an even bigger nightmare. Even if porting the engine on a high end gaming pc it would still be a nightmare, GRAW anyone?

Ever wonder why Geow is still the best looking game for x360? so how come no other games can even come close to it? Ever wonder why MS gave Epic extra millions to the programmers? and u know that other devs dont got that kind of money to spend.

even a $4000 gaming pc would have a hard time to run a x360 engine cuz its just weird and complex and here is why: unified architecture is not designed to work with a dx9 gpu and pixel shader3 that x360 has. And you all know that unified arch needs pixel shader 4 and dx10 in order to work right.

do u believe in karma now lemms?

GermanShepard06

Hahaha, that sounds VERY technical and that must be a direct quote.

I couldn't understand all that mumbo jumbo technical jargin in that bold/underlined sentence

hahaha

:D 

Factor5 said it, x360 hardware is such a nightmare to work with that when porting an engine to a different console it would be an even bigger nightmare. Even if porting the engine on a high end gaming pc it would still be a nightmare, GRAW anyone?

Ever wonder why Geow is still the best looking game for x360? so how come no other games can even come close to it? Ever wonder why MS gave Epic extra millions to the programmers? and u know that other devs dont got that kind of money to spend.

even a $4000 gaming pc would have a hard time to run a x360 engine cuz its just weird and complex and here is why: unified architecture is not designed to work with a dx9 gpu and pixel shader3 that x360 has. And you all know that unified arch needs pixel shader 4 and dx10 in order to work right.

do u believe in karma now lemms?

GermanShepard06

Link? No?

Besides you don't really make ANY sense...

Many many, many multiplat devs have said the PS3 is harder to develope for.  

Your also comparing Single Player to Multiplayer. Didn't think of that did you.Cubs360

don't forget about alpha footage that is very old.

I'm glad people still keep comparing games with new footage to old alpha footage of halo 3.

haha, fanboys. 

From my Inside Source, Philosoma.

 

"Whats up Keywii!

Yeah I live and teach in Japan, but right now I'm on Haruyasumi (spring break but kind of bigger like Xmas break in the USA) and I'm back in Cleveland for a while! And actually, the PS3 is slightly cheaper in Japan and they have lots of deals where you can turn in your old PS2 and gear for up to $200 off. PS3 is pretty huge in Japan, but Sony's target audience are guys around like 16-30 in age and to purchase a PS3 you must have a credit or bank debit card. It's labeled as the "adult's game system" here. 360 is sadly a joke, not because it's an American product or anything, it's because the Japanese just don't like games like FPS too much and more often than not the games are only sold per order - you can't just walk into Tsutaya and just buy 360 games because they are in such low demand.

I'll be back in Japan soon and if you want some pictures or some news about something just lemme know, maybe I can dig up something cool ^^

Philosoma"

 

I thought I'd share this with you all since it's a unique perspective. Thanks to Philosoma for the reporting.

KeyWii

haha, I guess I'll take your word for it I mean, you must be right, with that obviously real letter.

:roll: