KC_Hokie's forum posts

Avatar image for KC_Hokie
KC_Hokie

16099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

22

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 KC_Hokie
Member since 2006 • 16099 Posts
Man-made global warming...one of the biggest scams in human history.
Avatar image for KC_Hokie
KC_Hokie

16099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

22

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 KC_Hokie
Member since 2006 • 16099 Posts
Law is terrible as written. The intentions behind it and the reality are two completely different things. Even Max Bachus, who wrote the bill, stated it's a train wreck in practice.
Avatar image for KC_Hokie
KC_Hokie

16099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

22

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 KC_Hokie
Member since 2006 • 16099 Posts
He's not very effective as Speaker. But neither is Congress nor the President in their jobs for that matter.
Avatar image for KC_Hokie
KC_Hokie

16099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

22

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 KC_Hokie
Member since 2006 • 16099 Posts
[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]

[QUOTE="outworld222"]

Meh, I smell a falacy. If the Iranian Air force is so weak, how come we didn't dominate their airspace already? We would have done it such a long time ago see the way we are going. We attacked all the countries we said we would; Something is wrong here, so wrong.

outworld222

Because we aren't at war with them?

I was referring to the comments made here about how weak the Iranian air force is. But besides that point, I'm sure there are no shortage of chicken-hawks who would love to plant a false flag operation to start yet another war. Your comment means nothing. Today we are not at war, tomorrow, hey, anything can go.

Their air force is ancient. However, their air defense force (separate military branch) is stronger and more up to date.
Avatar image for KC_Hokie
KC_Hokie

16099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

22

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 KC_Hokie
Member since 2006 • 16099 Posts
[QUOTE="GOGOGOGURT"]

[QUOTE="deeliman"] It only means that your comment was so stupid it wasn't worth debunking.deeliman

 

You're the one who listed "enhanced", "regular", and "normal" global warming.  What kind of BS is that?  I'll let you choose this time.

Look up the difference between the greenhouse effect and the enhanced greenhouse effect.

Yea both were hypotheses on trying to explain climate. It turns out the climate sensitivity is even lower than thought.
Avatar image for KC_Hokie
KC_Hokie

16099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

22

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 KC_Hokie
Member since 2006 • 16099 Posts

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"][QUOTE="tenaka2"]

So you are happy to take your 'facts' from a known fake organisation funded by the coal industry?

A confirmation will be enough.

tenaka2

The data comes 100% from past IPCC reports. Go research them if you want.

I guess we can take that as a yes.

Here's a newer one from just this month graphing the same data:

GlobTemps.jpg

Avatar image for KC_Hokie
KC_Hokie

16099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

22

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 KC_Hokie
Member since 2006 • 16099 Posts

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"][QUOTE="tenaka2"]

Try again, here is the link to the bogus site.

http://www.thegwpf.org/ira-glickstein-ipcc-global-warming-predictions-seriously-flawed/

Are you sure you want to take your 'facts' from a known fake organisation funded by the coal industry?

tenaka2

The data itself comes straight from past IPCC reports. You can read them if you want.

So you are happy to take your 'facts' from a known fake organisation funded by the coal industry?

A confirmation will be enough.

The data comes 100% from past IPCC reports. Go research them if you want.
Avatar image for KC_Hokie
KC_Hokie

16099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

22

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 KC_Hokie
Member since 2006 • 16099 Posts

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]

[QUOTE="deeliman"] But is has been increasing faster than ever since the industrial revolution.deeliman

Again, not true at all. That's another myth the man-made climate change people try to push.

global%2Btemperature%2Bgraph.jpg

That graph only confirms what I was saying, as you can clearly see the rate at which the climate changes is significantly higher after the Industrial revolution.

No. Here is one showing the warming after the little ice age. The changes in climate were as severe if not more prior to the industrial revolution.

spencer.jpg

Avatar image for KC_Hokie
KC_Hokie

16099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

22

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 KC_Hokie
Member since 2006 • 16099 Posts

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"][QUOTE="tenaka2"]

No its not, its bogus and from this site.

http://www.thegwpf.org/

 

A group funded my european coal mining companies, and work out an office in london rented from a mining company.

 

You should really check your sources.

tenaka2

No try again. The base graph and data comes from IPCC reports.

Try again, here is the link to the bogus site.

http://www.thegwpf.org/ira-glickstein-ipcc-global-warming-predictions-seriously-flawed/

Are you sure you want to take your 'facts' from a known fake organisation funded by the coal industry?

The data itself comes straight from past IPCC reports. You can read them if you want.
Avatar image for KC_Hokie
KC_Hokie

16099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

22

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 KC_Hokie
Member since 2006 • 16099 Posts

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"][QUOTE="deeliman"] I know that climate change has always existed, no one is denying that. It's just that the rate at which the climate is changing is significantly higher than before humans started pumping greenhouse gasses into the air.deeliman
Not true at all. Little ice age ended started before industrial revolution. The current warming started in the mid 1700s.

But is has been increasing faster than ever since the industrial revolution.

Again, not true at all. That's another myth the man-made climate change people try to push.

global%2Btemperature%2Bgraph.jpg