[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"][QUOTE="tenaka2"]

Ira Glickstein? An electronic engineer? How is this person able to give an accurate view on climate?

 

About Ira Glickstein, PhD

[Retired] Senior System Engineer (Advanced Avionics and Visionics, Route Planning, Decision Aiding, Five Patents ... at IBM, Lockheed-Martin); Adjunct Associate Professor (System Engineering at University of Maryland, System Science and Computer Science at Binghamton University); PhD in System Science (Binghamton University, 1996); MS in System Science (Binghamton); Bachelors in Electrical Engineering (CCNY)

tenaka2

No its not, its bogus and from this site.

http://www.thegwpf.org/

A group funded my european coal mining companies, and work out an office in london rented from a mining company.

You should really check your sources.

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]

[QUOTE="deeliman"] No it's not really, since any time before the industrial revolution would be irrelevant. Unless you aren't talking about enhanced global warming and instead are talking about normal global warming, but arguing regular global warming doesn't exist is pretty stupid.deeliman

The notion that humans drive the climate hasn't been proven. In fact past predictions have been way off.

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]

tenaka2

Ira Glickstein? An electronic engineer? How is this person able to give an accurate view on climate?

About Ira Glickstein, PhD

[Retired] Senior System Engineer (Advanced Avionics and Visionics, Route Planning, Decision Aiding, Five Patents ... at IBM, Lockheed-Martin); Adjunct Associate Professor (System Engineering at University of Maryland, System Science and Computer Science at Binghamton University); PhD in System Science (Binghamton University, 1996); MS in System Science (Binghamton); Bachelors in Electrical Engineering (CCNY)

[QUOTE="GOGOGOGURT"]

[QUOTE="deeliman"]

 

deeliman

That's a very small slice of time to be trying to prove global warming.

The notion that humans drive the climate hasn't been proven. In fact past predictions have been way off.

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"][QUOTE="TigerSpiderman"]Almost certainly?tenaka2

What about these scientific groups? Are they all involved in the conspiracy?

All of these groups accept man made global warming.

Almost certainly?TigerSpiderman

No net increase in temperature in 15 years!:

[QUOTE="Nibroc420"][QUOTE="deeliman"]

You guys do know that making mistakes and then correcting them is part of the scientific method, right?

deeliman

You guys do know that making mistakes and then correcting them is part of the scientific method, right?

deeliman

So instead of them saying they have no clue if humans drive climate or not they degraded it from 100% to 95%.

They pulled that 95% out of their arses just like the 100%.

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]

Love the way they keep changing the 'goal posts'. First, they claimed humans were responsible for warming since the industrial revolution and now it's '1950s' (they started there because the 40s cooled after a warm 1930s). First humans drove the climate without a doubt but now it's '95%...maybe, sorta' and all of our past climate change models and predictions were way off. Believe us this time...pretty please. We are super serial.

Just don't think people take the IPCC seriously anymore.

GOGOGOGURT

I've read so many "desicive" "studies" on "global warming", they've changed it more than that.  It happened yesterday you know.