KC_Hokie's forum posts

Avatar image for KC_Hokie
KC_Hokie

16099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

22

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 KC_Hokie
Member since 2006 • 16099 Posts

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"][QUOTE="killzowned24"] I suggest you watch the US debate because that came up, and Kerry agreed that Assad will do just that because that is not the purpose of the action,it's only to downgrade his ability.killzowned24
Yea exactly...symbolic strike. Assad has had 2+ weeks to prepare for these strikes too. He's moved everything around.

Like this? It boggles the mind we have posters like you defending that scum. ''Syrian regime moves prisoners to likely targets of western military strikes'' http://www.thenational.ae/news/world/middle-east/syrian-regime-moves-prisoners-to-likely-targets-of-western-military-strikes

Defending him? No not at all. Announcing a strike 2+ weeks before it happens is extremely stupid and won't be successful. It's symbolic at best.

Avatar image for KC_Hokie
KC_Hokie

16099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

22

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 KC_Hokie
Member since 2006 • 16099 Posts
Think France is still on board. They released some agitprop about evidence of Assad being behind the attacks earlier.MrPraline
Less than 50-50 chance the French parliament goes along with the strike.
Avatar image for KC_Hokie
KC_Hokie

16099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

22

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 KC_Hokie
Member since 2006 • 16099 Posts
[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]

[QUOTE="killzowned24"] yes, it shows the grow more pansies by the decade. they do after all shoot bb guns as sport.killzowned24

No, it's because this strike is purely symbolic and idiotic. It will be used as propaganda by Assad if the strikes are weak. If they are heavier it will help Al-Qaeda.

I suggest you watch the US debate because that came up, and Kerry agreed that Assad will do just that because that is not the purpose of the action,it's only to downgrade his ability.

Yea exactly...symbolic strike. Assad has had 2+ weeks to prepare for these strikes too. He's moved everything around.
Avatar image for KC_Hokie
KC_Hokie

16099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

22

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 KC_Hokie
Member since 2006 • 16099 Posts
[QUOTE="The_Lipscomb"][QUOTE="KC_Hokie"][QUOTE="killzowned24"] http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/syria/10278355/Syria-crisis-Britain-will-play-active-role-in-military-action-despite-vote-defeat.html

Really neat but they are unwilling to strike with us. Again, major alarm bells should be going off.

I feel really bad for all the countries we drag into this.

Looks like absolutely no one is attacking with us. Obama is the world's vigilante.
Avatar image for KC_Hokie
KC_Hokie

16099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

22

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 KC_Hokie
Member since 2006 • 16099 Posts

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"][QUOTE="killzowned24"] http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/syria/10278355/Syria-crisis-Britain-will-play-active-role-in-military-action-despite-vote-defeat.htmlkillzowned24
Really neat but they are unwilling to strike with us. Again, major alarm bells should be going off.

yes, it shows the grow more pansies by the decade. they do after all shoot bb guns as sport.

No, it's because this strike is purely symbolic and idiotic. It will be used as propaganda by Assad if the strikes are weak. If they are heavier it will help Al-Qaeda.

Avatar image for KC_Hokie
KC_Hokie

16099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

22

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 KC_Hokie
Member since 2006 • 16099 Posts
[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]Just read what McCain added at the last minute. This will never pass in the House.Hemmaroids
About arming rebels something he wanted to do a long time ago when AQ wasn't such a strong influence? The arming is strategically important. Just bombing using cruise missles won't really put up a fight against Assad in the long term as arming the rebels. Though I am iffy on the rebels now (compared to 30 months ago) I do support arming them to achieve a strategic task.

It's more than that. What McCain added topples the Assad regime. And it will never pass the House.
Avatar image for KC_Hokie
KC_Hokie

16099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

22

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 KC_Hokie
Member since 2006 • 16099 Posts
[QUOTE="killzowned24"][QUOTE="KC_Hokie"][QUOTE="killzowned24"] Actually the have said no military force,but will help with intel and such.

Yea...our closest ally isn't even with us and thinks a strike is stupid.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/syria/10278355/Syria-crisis-Britain-will-play-active-role-in-military-action-despite-vote-defeat.html

Really neat but they are unwilling to strike with us. Again, major alarm bells should be going off.
Avatar image for KC_Hokie
KC_Hokie

16099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

22

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 KC_Hokie
Member since 2006 • 16099 Posts
[QUOTE="Person0"][QUOTE="KC_Hokie"][QUOTE="Person0"] Well many of the defecting soldiers joined the FSA.

Yea they went home to protect their homes. If you look at the major offensive victories for the rebels they were all lead by the Islamists.

Well that's good then. The experienced FSA fighters are staying alive, while the Islamists are taking the brunt of Assad's military. So the Islamists have higher losses. Weaker Islamists is good.

The Islamists will kick the crap out of the FSA in the next war if Assad falls.
Avatar image for KC_Hokie
KC_Hokie

16099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

22

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 KC_Hokie
Member since 2006 • 16099 Posts
[QUOTE="killzowned24"][QUOTE="KC_Hokie"][QUOTE="killzowned24"] What are you not understanding. I said they agree he did it ,but are willing to let it slide.

That even the UK isn't with us in this strike.

Actually the have said no military force,but will help with intel and such.

Yea...our closest ally isn't even with us and thinks a strike is stupid.
Avatar image for KC_Hokie
KC_Hokie

16099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

22

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 KC_Hokie
Member since 2006 • 16099 Posts
[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]

[QUOTE="Person0"] The FSA is about even power and number wise with the Islamists.Person0

Most FSA are just militia protecting their neighborhood or town. They aren't offensive, ruthless, experienced fighters like the Islamists.

And Islamists never share. There will be a war after this one if Assad falls and the FSA is in deep shit.

Well many of the defecting soldiers joined the FSA.

Yea they went home to protect their homes. If you look at the major offensive victories for the rebels they were all lead by the Islamists.