As long as the story is good without heavily depending on special effects...don't really care who directs it.
KC_Hokie's forum posts
It's also noteworthy that the republican party has made this the least productive Congress in history.
I would argue Congress being 'unproductive' is a plus not a negative. The last time they were really 'productive' they came up with crap like Obamacare and the 'stimulus'.
I wish the Congress would be part time with a similar schedule to the national guard....one weekend a month, two weeks in the summer.
South Park is one of my all time favorite shows. However, the quality over the last few seasons has really declined. Creators must be out of ideas or something.
They need to spend longer working on each episode. The plot lines often don't make sense anymore and often just end abruptly when the 30 minutes is up.
Hilarious to see democrats scramble over a bill they never read but voted for. 2014 elections are going to be very interesting.
LOL I see Hokie's retarded self is back, smh
You're only 'retarded' if you believe current temperatures are "unprecedented".
@KC_Hokie: That graph stops at 1855...
How convinient Hokie, right before the industrial revolution.
Talk about intellectual dishonesty....
Look at the graphs. Most of the warming of the last 300 years actually took place prior to the industrial revolution.
source?
Ice core samples. See my posts above.
Most of the warming since the little ice age occurred prior to the Second Industrial Revolution which started in the 1860s. That was the start of mass production, steel, etc. and the start of large amounts of human created CO2.
There's no graph on the source you gave.
I still need a source.
Still looking for a source KC
You might just learn something: https://www.google.com/search?q=vostok+ice+core
I see a whole lot of stuff that supports the accepted model on climate change, but I don't see the graph you linked.
For the 4th time, what's your source? If it's so easy to google it, just give me a link to the site.
All of the Vostok graphs show the same data from the Vostok core drilling in East Antarctica.
Try actually reading about it. Again, you might learn something.
Original Study: http://www.cnrs.fr/cw/en/pres/compress/mist030699.html
Look at the source of graphs...."Petit et al. 1999 Nature"

@KC_Hokie: That graph stops at 1855...
How convinient Hokie, right before the industrial revolution.
Talk about intellectual dishonesty....
Look at the graphs. Most of the warming of the last 300 years actually took place prior to the industrial revolution.
source?
Ice core samples. See my posts above.
Most of the warming since the little ice age occurred prior to the Second Industrial Revolution which started in the 1860s. That was the start of mass production, steel, etc. and the start of large amounts of human created CO2.
There's no graph on the source you gave.
I still need a source.
Still looking for a source KC
You might just learn something: https://www.google.com/search?q=vostok+ice+core
I thin kthe 'Preset' picture is a little bit confusing because there are free areas that still belong to the palestinians and it is shown as white here so it;s pretty much incorrect.
If the Israelis occupy and settle the land it doesn't really matter if the Palestinians think it 'belongs' to them or not.
Whatsoever this map can't be really correct because nobody really knows to map all the settlers' locations and it's not THAT many especially near Jericho where there are no settlers and the map indicates that everything there is white.
The point is 'Palestine' isn't going to exist in 50 years at this rate. No matter what map you look at of the Israeli settlements you have to recognize how much territory was gained in the West Bank by Israel.
I understand your point well but History\politics can't be measured like math you know. Mathematically you are correct but the problem is that it doesn't work like that.
Not sure what 'history' you're referring to but the reality is Palestinians rejected the original offer and instead declare wars. They lost every war and keep losing territory.
In 50 years they might only control Gaza with the West Bank being absorbed by Israel.
I thin kthe 'Preset' picture is a little bit confusing because there are free areas that still belong to the palestinians and it is shown as white here so it;s pretty much incorrect.
If the Israelis occupy and settle the land it doesn't really matter if the Palestinians think it 'belongs' to them or not.
Whatsoever this map can't be really correct because nobody really knows to map all the settlers' locations and it's not THAT many especially near Jericho where there are no settlers and the map indicates that everything there is white.
The point is 'Palestine' isn't going to exist in 50 years at this rate. No matter what map you look at of the Israeli settlements you have to recognize how much territory was gained in the West Bank by Israel.
I thin kthe 'Preset' picture is a little bit confusing because there are free areas that still belong to the palestinians and it is shown as white here so it;s pretty much incorrect.
If the Israelis occupy and settle the land it doesn't really matter if the Palestinians think it 'belongs' to them or not.
Log in to comment