@DARKKNIGHTPRABZ I could care less about amazing graphics...What i want to see is actual OPEN GAMEPLAY. Not none of this on rails crap...Your consoles have 8GB of RAM to work with...Stop with these linear Corridor crap this gen.
No Mod Support, Most likely wont even see 64 player battles on console, prolly more tiny maps as well....What happened to you Dice? Where is the Battlefield 2 Sequal we have waited soo long for.
@b74kd3th the funny thing is the larger the Hard Drive, often the slower the games play. As in Loading and such. Wonder if the same thing will be true for console. 500GB should be enough for the first few years if you leave every game installed.
@b74kd3th this day in age, There is ZERO reason for them to charge us to play games Online...Id much rather stick to PS4 or better yet, My PC. Where playing games on multiplayer is free. I dont understand how people are fine with being charged to play their games online.
@alien33 The thing is you are not going to see a huge graphical improvement. What you will be able to see with the next gen is more open and larger environments. Less Pop in, Better Frame rates....But this is COD, I doubt we will still have the same old tiny maps.
It may look a bit better, (Nothing really amazing, BF3 looks just as good). But its most likely still going to be the same COD that is on Rails...with tiny maps and linear gameplay.
@BuBsay Yeah lol, it looks no better than BF3, or like you said Metro or Crysis. Now I mostly play on PC but I know for a fact that the next gen consoles can do better. Im pretty certain this is as far as you will see the COD visuals get pushed.
Take a good look at the graphics for the next gen COD, cuz this is pretty much what you will be stuck with (visual-wise) For all the remaining COD's because they dont even really bother to change anything with the visuals or engine.
Kooken58's comments