LOXO7's forum posts

Avatar image for LOXO7
LOXO7

5595

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

40

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 LOXO7
Member since 2008 • 5595 Posts

[QUOTE="WhiteKnight77"]

Did the judge drop the charges or did the prosecutor?

br0kenrabbit

Dunno, the judge called my name, said I could go as the case was dismissed, and then asked if I was sure I didn't want a trial (his attempt at humor, I think). That was it.

Make a list of financial difficulties this has caused you, like your time away from work, extra time at your therapist, and prescribed medication from your doctor for all of your headaches and sue the city for employing inept public servants that caused this upon you.
Avatar image for LOXO7
LOXO7

5595

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

40

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 LOXO7
Member since 2008 • 5595 Posts
[QUOTE="WhiteKnight77"]

Did the judge drop the charges or did the prosecutor?

LJS9502_basic
DA does that.....and for anything minor....like this..it's ridiculous to hire an attorney.

Until after he is found guilty.
Avatar image for LOXO7
LOXO7

5595

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

40

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 LOXO7
Member since 2008 • 5595 Posts

[QUOTE="BMD004"]

The reason creationism isn't promoted in public schools is because people of all different beliefs are at those schools, and that is the only public school there is to attend.

 

But when parents can send their child to whatever school they want, this issue is avoided.

jimkabrhel

Separation of church and state. No creationism in public schools.

To add to the list of good reasons not to have anyone you know attend a public school. The public school doesn't teach liberty.

Avatar image for LOXO7
LOXO7

5595

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

40

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 LOXO7
Member since 2008 • 5595 Posts

[QUOTE="LOXO7"]College is okay only for engineering or medicine, but for everything else there are trade schools.Aljosa23

Interesting, what trade school can I go to to get my Law degree?

Law degree, right. Our law is easy to understand. You don't need a degree to do so. If you are having trouble, go to the 3rd grade. There you will learn how to read English.
Avatar image for LOXO7
LOXO7

5595

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

40

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 LOXO7
Member since 2008 • 5595 Posts
Its because of your race.DaBrainz
Yeah, if you were black he would have shot you.
Avatar image for LOXO7
LOXO7

5595

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

40

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Avatar image for LOXO7
LOXO7

5595

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

40

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 LOXO7
Member since 2008 • 5595 Posts

Blindly giving parents money to send their students to schools where they aren't getting a proper education isn't the answer. 

jimkabrhel

Is it that likely that the parents are going to sabotage their own children's future that the public must decide what is best for them instead?

Avatar image for LOXO7
LOXO7

5595

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

40

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 LOXO7
Member since 2008 • 5595 Posts
[QUOTE="Barbariser"][QUOTE="LOXO7"][QUOTE="Barbariser"] Practically none of this is correct from an economic perspective. Macroeconomic theory shows that when in a recession caused by a lack of demand (a.k.a., this one) the main solutions are to increase the money supply and increase government spending. This is the reason why the pro-stimulus U.S. with its aggressive central bank is crushing the pro-austerity and (until recently) tight-money Eurozone and U.K. in the post-recession recovery. Workforce decline is primarily due to the aging of the U.S. population, a universal condition across most of the world and something you can't fix by reducing taxes.

There is never a lack of demand. We all want the things that are in Back To The Future. The lack that we have is production. This is supposedly remedied with more stimulus through taxes and printing. Yes, because the less money you have the more incentive you are to invest into hovering skateboards instead of buying energy, shelter, and food.

Nope, you're also completely wrong as usual (hint: a sudden fall in income for any reason can cause a fall in demand, such as the bursting of a large bubble which is what happened, or an increase in the propensity to save, which also happened as a result of said bubble bursting) and your idea that this recession was caused by falls in supply is hilarious. Why the fvck would a bunch of U.S. producers just shut down factories if there was demand for their goods? :roll: Lol at your complete misuse of economic terminology, taxes are not a form of stimulus.

I should have been more careful. I didn't know you have virgin eyes unknowing that taxes are spent to stimulate the economy.
Avatar image for LOXO7
LOXO7

5595

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

40

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 LOXO7
Member since 2008 • 5595 Posts

Eventually the "good" schools will be overcrowded and each child will suffer because they aren't getting 1-on-1 education.

It isn't an "either/or" scenario, underfunded schools need funding before anything else happens.

Aljosa23

Looks like a problem an entrepreneur could solve.  Government problem solving would be to put more money into the failing school, because people spend other people's money conservatively.  They know exactly were to put the money and how much because it's somone elses.

Avatar image for LOXO7
LOXO7

5595

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

40

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 LOXO7
Member since 2008 • 5595 Posts
[QUOTE="Solaryellow"]As a whole, the Liberal persuasion loves to take (steal) my money and constantly pour it into programs and services and when they fail (which they normally do) the solution isn't to change the game plan but to throw more and more money at a problem. The United States fairs quite poorly in terms of education when compared to the rest of the modern and civilized world. Instead of holding students, teachers and parents responsible and accountable along with changing the curriculum, we'll just throw more and more money at the problem.....cause eventually it will work, right? Wrong.

Money is one of the biggest difference between myself and your average Liberal. Fixing a problem goes beyond money. Unemployment is rather high and the work force is at its lowest since the 1970's. Instead of creating jobs and making the United States a more business friendly climate the solution from the left is to increase unemployment and benefits.

We've seen the Liberal experiment fail all over the country.

To the person above me, being a conservative is different than being a Republican. Look at McCain as an example.

Barbariser
Practically none of this is correct from an economic perspective. Macroeconomic theory shows that when in a recession caused by a lack of demand (a.k.a., this one) the main solutions are to increase the money supply and increase government spending. This is the reason why the pro-stimulus U.S. with its aggressive central bank is crushing the pro-austerity and (until recently) tight-money Eurozone and U.K. in the post-recession recovery. Workforce decline is primarily due to the aging of the U.S. population, a universal condition across most of the world and something you can't fix by reducing taxes.

There is never a lack of demand. We all want the things that are in Back To The Future. The lack that we have is production. This is supposedly remedied with more stimulus through taxes and printing. Yes, because the less money you have the more incentive you are to invest into hovering skateboards instead of buying energy, shelter, and food.