LowTechGeek's comments

Avatar image for LowTechGeek
LowTechGeek

161

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@ArabrockermanX: I love how you kids these days endlessly fail to recognize satire when you see it. It gives me many chuckles. Also despair.

Avatar image for LowTechGeek
LowTechGeek

161

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

God forbid that a character named Zelda be the protagonist in a game called The Legend of Zelda! I mean that wouldn't make any sense!

Avatar image for LowTechGeek
LowTechGeek

161

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I'm a fan of the game series. I'm not a fan of this movie. The humor of the games did not translate, in large part because for some reason the writers felt like they had to explain every joke. It felt like the movie was written for children 8 years of age or younger, like Insomniac was trying to recruit a new generation of R&C fans, but by doing so, completely forsaking its core base for the last 14 years. The only joke I laughed at was the Wilhelm scream. Other than that, I was quite bored.

I'm so disappointed in this movie. I had such high hopes. Instead, I'm forced to point it to the back of the long line of bad game to movie translations.

Avatar image for LowTechGeek
LowTechGeek

161

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Avatar image for LowTechGeek
LowTechGeek

161

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

GameSpot really needs a copy editor.

Avatar image for LowTechGeek
LowTechGeek

161

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By LowTechGeek

"And so, for the completionists, they're going to have more work to do."

I play games to relax. That's why they're called games. When did games become work? Do I have to declare on my taxes now that I have two jobs?

Avatar image for LowTechGeek
LowTechGeek

161

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@jameson425 I hate to be this guy, but FYI, *who*, not whom, on both accounts, because in both cases the person referred to is the subject. I applaud the effort, however.

Avatar image for LowTechGeek
LowTechGeek

161

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Microsoft paid 1053 people to support this.

Avatar image for LowTechGeek
LowTechGeek

161

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@BoromiRwcgeorge That's what he said

Avatar image for LowTechGeek
LowTechGeek

161

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I gotta agree with MacBeth on this one. The insurance company backed the loan and it failed, so they should pay.