@Plasmid_king No thats not True. Right now, if you buy used games, the only content that are blocked is the online multiplayer part of the game, not the single player of the game. Maybe in the next Gen. they are going to block both. You are just going to have acces to 40% of the single player and the rest you have to pay to unlocked.

I only want to buy a game and use it on every console i want.And with different accounts and offline, and i want to have 100% acces to the single player content. If they allowed to play used games but only 40% of the content and the rest you have to pay a fee to unlocked it. Then I Say Good Bye To Sony and Microsoft.

Im worried about this. Yes i see the news when sony says that ps4 is not going to block used games. And that if you buy a Physical copy you can play it in every ps4 console. But i think theres something weird. The sony representative that said that dont clearly explains that. Maybe you have to pay a license in PSN so your ps4 could play used games. Thats strange that Microsoft are going to block used games and ps4 dont. We still dont know anything about how you can play used games on the ps4.

@Ravenlore_basic @Marcusraitor Games are always a high risk business. Always, is not new now. So if they dont like a big risk business to work for, then Cliff Blesinski should do something else. The industry always work since atari nes etc.without DLC online DRM and all that crap. And the money to make games, some are from government support, some are money of the publishers. But this is not new, there always works like that since gaming beggins a lot of studios closed and go bankrupt and other studios wins a lot of money. So for me this is only greedy to include all dlc and online drm and blocked used games. Developers are just doing things that are worse to the gaming industry than to give a remedy. The same developers are the ones, that are killing gaming.

When all games are digitall only. And lose freedom of how you can play the game, thats the day when the crash is going to come. Cliff Blesinski dont likes physical media. He also wants to control gamers how and when to play the games.He wants that all games have always online DRM, and all of that. Hes bad for the gaming industry.

I was talking about single player, if these game cant be played single player well. I understand the online features for multiplayer but these game should not be on a console. I dont like MMOs on consoles these should be release only on PC or Mac.

@TheSkyrimStatue @Marcusraitor Because PC games you have no control of the games you buy, yeah always connected maybe is going to be used to update more gameplay elements, weapons, and experience, but i dont like that idea, this could be done offline too. Look at Skyrim, you can have unlimited number of random quests offline and you dont need to be always connected. Or they can put new missions or quests coordinated with your calendar of your console like animal crossing style but with guns and everything. To be online connected just to receive missions or new experiences is more control for developers and publishers, cero control for gamers. Thats my opinion.And yes i know you can connect once and the experience updates and then you could play offline, but that means for me that you still depending of the servers for more features, and in skyrim i dont depend of that. I have the whole expirience with me.

I dont like always connected online games. So i dont care about this game. No control of these game, no freedom, etc. I dont like this idea.And specially that is going to be on consoles this should be a pc only release. Gaming is dying for me, with this kind of games.

Im only interested in the Single Player Campaign. Im going to wait and see if its too short.

@Metronoid Your wrong. Like me are a lot who prefer to play crappy games but having 100% control of my purchases than playing a super ultra cool game that the developer controls everything and the gamer nothing.