Mausolus' comments

Avatar image for Mausolus
Mausolus

38

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

@Blazius2 That bothers you more than random children and adults getting shot?

Avatar image for Mausolus
Mausolus

38

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

Edited By Mausolus

$10 million is apparently what it costs to grease the wheels of progress in Washington. It will likely do little to detract the hard-core gun advocates but it may swing the middle to show that the administration is considering a balanced response rather than just pushing party politics. If you compare this amount to our deficit and the amount they spend on other frivolous things, it's barely a blip on the radar.

Avatar image for Mausolus
Mausolus

38

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

Edited By Mausolus

@Double_Wide No, you misunderstood the metaphor. The band-aid may not treat the underlying cause but it does stabilize the immediate situation. I wasn't thinking of it as something that 'doesnt work'. As I said before no guns = no shootings. I'm still pretty convinced. (Oh and yes, I am old enough to vote, and I'm also rich enough to give money to non-profit organizations to help promote my point of view... fear me!)

Avatar image for Mausolus
Mausolus

38

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

Edited By Mausolus

@Double_Wide @Mausolus I'd want the band-aid until the surgeon was ready to operate.

Avatar image for Mausolus
Mausolus

38

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

@Double_Wide @Mausolus Not ignoring it, I just think it's easier to control guns than it is to identify and deal with lunatics likely to use them. If someone had a concrete proposal to solve it the other way I'd probably go for it instead.

On a more conciliatory note, I think we ALL agree on one thing : THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH VIDEO GAMES!

Avatar image for Mausolus
Mausolus

38

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

@Double_Wide @Mausolus As someone that doesn't own a gun by choice, I think it's a perfectly reasonable position for me to take that as few other people as possible should own guns. It'd really suck if I got shot one day by a lunatic that stole a legally owned gun off his mother.

Avatar image for Mausolus
Mausolus

38

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

@dsmpunk There's a distinction between idealism and pragmatism. Idealistically I'd like to see guns only in the hands of people that are tightly vetted and pledged to use them only for 'good' (eg: police), and nobody else. Realistically though, how to get there given that there are so many guns already in circulation? I have no idea, if I had the answer I'd run for president. Making it harder to get them seems like a good first step to me.

Avatar image for Mausolus
Mausolus

38

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

@dsmpunk I want to help make society a place where people don't live in constant fear. I believe most people that are militant about owning guns are afraid of something, whether it's the 'feds', terrorists, criminals, whatever. That's no way to live.

Avatar image for Mausolus
Mausolus

38

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

@Double_Wide @dsmpunk Yeah maybe New Yorkers could have shot the planes down before they hit the towers if only that evil Mayor would have let them carry their guns. You've made a convert out of me, it all makes curious sense now.

Avatar image for Mausolus
Mausolus

38

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

Edited By Mausolus

@dsmpunk If nobody owned guns, we wouldn't have any mass-shootings. I don't think that's a very subjective statement.