@Lhomity @kdokey What good is there in losing out on content that used to be part of the base game before publishers got greedy? Keep supporting yourself losing out on content.
You save $8 by giving them your money much earlier so they can gain interest on it! Such an amazing deal! I bet most of it was already developed during the same timeframe as the base game. What a crock of poop. This trend continues and DLC will soon cost more than the games itself, maybe even 2 times as much. $100+ for every game and some for $180!
Maybe too I dunno make the thing less expensive to produce since Sony is hurting financially... Weird how suddenly 2009 is only 1 year ago... GET A CLUE.
You were the one who threw insults out, calling me a little kid. I could care less for AR because that is a complete gimmick when it comes to gaming. Who the hell has abandoned buildings like that to create a battlefield game within them. Even if you did you would have too many other idiots running around trying to play a game with their AR glasses. You would run into him and you would both fall on your fucking asses. Entirely impractical. You can stop posting replies because I'm not going to read anything else coming from your hypocritical mouth. See ya!
It's like COD, only Rockstar actually uses their sales potential to put time into making the game it can be by the time it releases. One can only imagine what COD could be like.
@hellrazorangel I have tried VR simulators and they were not gimmicky at all, they were truly immersive. Funny how you resort to the little kid crap when I am probably older than you. You have still not explained why it is gimmicky, therefor you fail.
Things have changed since the early VR experiences in the 90's, yet even back then there were some good high end experiences at some of the better arcades.
Now tell us what is the future of gaming? How can you make it more immersive?
Meta-Gnostic's comments