You have to consider that COD4 and Assasins Creed will be major system sellers. For those that have not yet bought a next gen console and want a next gen console for just COD4 Or assasins creed, chances are they are going to choose to buy the PS3 for those games instead of a 360.. Why you ask?! Well for starters why not pay $50.00 more for built in blu ray and WIFI and also Free online, especially the COD4 fans, why pay $400.00 for a 360 and a year of xbox live to play COD 4 online when you can pay the same amount for a PS3 and get FREE ONLINE, Double the HDD Space, Built in WIFI and most of all built in Blu ray..

So yes, COD 4 and Assassins creed are 2 multiplats that will MOVE PS3s. Lets think about it from a consumer's standpoint, not a "System Wars" fanboy standpoint. Lets say hes in the market to buy a next gen console and that consumer has pretty much grown up on PS2 for the last 5 years, he has $400.00 to spend on a next gen console.. So give me one reasonable explanation he would not choose a PS3 over a 360.. 1.Its more reliable. 2.its free online, 3.COD4 and Assassins Creed will own. 4.It has built in WIFI and blu ray, NO BC you say, eh not a big deal.. He still has his trusty PS2

Huge maps are bad? How did Battlefield 2 get AAA? Just because you are bad at the game doesn't mean the game is terrible

aaron6581230

yes huge maps are bad when a game is this unbalanced. The only good maps are badlands and eucadia, Eucadia is the best map by far

And now, when he's rumbled as a fake boy, he makes one desperate last attempt to seem unbiased.

Pathetic. Get out of here.

Newnab

dude no, im not trying to be unbiased, i still think the PS3 is the better console im just simply stating Warhawk is garbage.my PSN id is Skiid if you dont believe me

[QUOTE="MikeCOD80"]

now I know this will come as a shock since my threads lately have all been negative about the 360 but I just have to get this off my chest.. As much as I like the PS3 i have to admit warhawk is so boring, unbalanced and more aggravating then it is fun.. Ok first of all, why are the maps SO HUGE! I mean my god, i know they wanted it to seem like you had variety but the maps are just sooooo freaking huge. I mean so huge that it needs to be like 50 VS 50 on maps these big, and it makes the game feel terribly unbalanced.

and OMG the one thing i cannot stand is how you have to walk FOREVER in order to find a warhawk to get into. Oh how nice it would be just to be able to choose if you want to respawn in a warhawk or on foot because the ground combat is just plain terrible! Dont get me wrong the game is awesome when you are dogfighting but the problem is noone ever plays dogfight only matches, and i hate nothing more than when i do FINALLY find a warhawk and take off into the skies i get blown up seconds later only to find myself back on foot walking and walking and walking until FINALLY i get to a warhawk but NO, one of my teammates gets to the warhawk first and here i am stuck wondering these HUGE unbalanced maps trying to get into a warhawk yet again.

Overall the pacing of the game is extremely boring, the maps are waaay too big, Warhawks need to be more readily avaliable and it should let you choose if you want to respawn on foot or on the ground, if it had that feature the game would be a blast becasue the game is extremely fun once your in the warhawk dogfighting but sadly you are spending a majority of your time walking around aimlessly or in the menus trying to get into a game.

Again i know this will come as a shock to all of you because yes i do like the PS3 better but man Warhawk is just one terrible game how it got 8.5 here ill never know..

lebaneseprince1

Skiid is my PSN

now I know this will come as a shock since my threads lately have all been negative about the 360 but I just have to get this off my chest.. As much as I like the PS3 i have to admit warhawk is so boring, unbalanced and more aggravating then it is fun.. Ok first of all, why are the maps SO HUGE! I mean my god, i know they wanted it to seem like you had variety but the maps are just sooooo freaking huge. I mean so huge that it needs to be like 50 VS 50 on maps these big, and it makes the game feel terribly unbalanced.

and OMG the one thing i cannot stand is how you have to walk FOREVER in order to find a warhawk to get into. Oh how nice it would be just to be able to choose if you want to respawn in a warhawk or on foot because the ground combat is just plain terrible! Dont get me wrong the game is awesome when you are dogfighting but the problem is noone ever plays dogfight only matches, and i hate nothing more than when i do FINALLY find a warhawk and take off into the skies i get blown up seconds later only to find myself back on foot walking and walking and walking until FINALLY i get to a warhawk but NO, one of my teammates gets to the warhawk first and here i am stuck wondering these HUGE unbalanced maps trying to get into a warhawk yet again.

Overall the pacing of the game is extremely boring, the maps are waaay too big, Warhawks need to be more readily avaliable and it should let you choose if you want to respawn on foot or on the ground, if it had that feature the game would be a blast becasue the game is extremely fun once your in the warhawk dogfighting but sadly you are spending a majority of your time walking around aimlessly or in the menus trying to get into a game.

Again i know this will come as a shock to all of you because yes i do like the PS3 better but man Warhawk is just one terrible game how it got 8.5 here ill never know..

[QUOTE="MikeCOD80"]

I dont know why people are saying Halo 3 will last 2,3 and even 4 years before it gets boring. This gen is a totally different ball game, the reason Halo 2 lasted so long because there wasnt really any other xbox multiplayer game that did multiplayer as good as Halo 2 did back in the day, Halo 2 was one of a kind back in the day but now compared to games like COD4,Warhawk, Gears Of War, Resistance, Unreal Tournament etc.. Halo 3 is just another run of the mill online FPS. Dont get me wrong I see it lasting a good while, but thinking it will have the same replay value for years and years like Halo 2 did is just plain naive..

Halo 2 online multiplayer was state of the art back in the day for online shooters, but now those type of online shooters are a dime a dozen, i expect Halo 3 to last a good solid year before it gets boring and noone really plays it that much anymore. Especially with Killzone 2, Socom, UT3 and MGO on the horizon

lebaneseprince1

[QUOTE="MikeCOD80"]

I dont know why people are saying Halo 3 will last 2,3 and even 4 years before it gets boring. This gen is a totally different ball game, the reason Halo 2 lasted so long because there wasnt really any other xbox multiplayer game that did multiplayer as good as Halo 2 did back in the day, Halo 2 was one of a kind back in the day but now compared to games like COD4,Warhawk, Gears Of War, Resistance, Unreal Tournament etc.. Halo 3 is just another run of the mill online FPS. Dont get me wrong I see it lasting a good while, but thinking it will have the same replay value for years and years like Halo 2 did is just plain naive..

Halo 2 online multiplayer was state of the art back in the day for online shooters, but now those type of online shooters are a dime a dozen, i expect Halo 3 to last a good solid year before it gets boring and noone really plays it that much anymore. Especially with Killzone 2, Socom, UT3 and MGO on the horizon

lebaneseprince1

:::yawn:: yep im a fakeboy, has it ever occured to you that someone can own both consoles and still prefer one over the other.. By the way, Gamertag is Hallowedsaint, hit me up for a game some time... Owned

I dont know why people are saying Halo 3 will last 2,3 and even 4 years before it gets boring. This gen is a totally different ball game, the reason Halo 2 lasted so long because there wasnt really any other xbox multiplayer game that did multiplayer as good as Halo 2 did back in the day, Halo 2 was one of a kind back in the day but now compared to games like COD4,Warhawk, Gears Of War, Resistance, Unreal Tournament etc.. Halo 3 is just another run of the mill online FPS. Dont get me wrong I see it lasting a good while, but thinking it will have the same replay value for years and years like Halo 2 did is just plain naive..

Halo 2 online multiplayer was state of the art back in the day for online shooters, but now those type of online shooters are a dime a dozen, i expect Halo 3 to last a good solid year before it gets boring and noone really plays it that much anymore. Especially with Killzone 2, Socom, UT3 and MGO on the horizon

i did. i mean, ill still go back to it occasionally, but im not playing it much

i only got halo 3 it see how it ended, and the co op. ive never really like halo online

it just bugs me that you cant really take down 2-3 guys at one time unless you ambush them or something. not like in, say, cod where you could mow down the entire enemy team granted ure in a good spot

players just have way to damn much health. and bungie sucks at map design. like in halo 2, theres so little to take cover behind in a few of the maps. any idiot with a battle or sniper rifle can take ure ass down

though the vehicles in halo 3s mp are fun. and theater mode is great

REforever101

I totally agree, its too easy to get kills on halo 3 and especially wide open maps like valhalla and snowbound with Practically NOTHING to take cover behind all it takes is a laser noob to get the spartan laser or battle rifle and your dead. and yes i was in the COD 4 beta and its leaps and bounds better than Halo 3 in terms of map and overall gameplay