[QUOTE="PS3_3DO"]

Back to your basements hermits, next year the PS3 has more great games then the PC is going to have. Also 360 has NG2, Fable 2, Banjo three, Halo Wars,GTA: IV that isn't on the PC and don't expect for it for a year or more if it ever gets ported. Yeah next year the Consoles are going to rule you hear me hermits. :o :cry:

Danm_999

[QUOTE="the-very-best"]

It will get more games.

But explain why GTAIV isn't going to Wii. Or RE5. Or DMCIV. Or COD4. Or Assassin's Creed. Or any other major 3rd party title. Devs have to look into what console is right for them. It's more than just about sales.

hoplayletsplay

I think one of the reasons why so many big titles have been delayed is because of the install base, well, I think you'll get what I mean here. Secondly, if every developers completely abandon the wii, wouldn't they focus more on the ps3/360 games which will lead to a better experience?

When I look at my most anticipated game, FFXIII, I realised the install base for the ps3 really has a big impact on its release date. I'm just hoping we can get at least 2 more FF for the remaining life time of the ps3. That said, I think the bigger the install base is, the faster the great games will come.

lets not forget also that at this moment wii install base isnt much higher then 360 installbase, so they just rather stick with 360 for now, ONLY if wii sales keepgrowing and suprasses 360 and ps3 by a big margin we will start to see those things happening

[QUOTE="Mizarus"][QUOTE="the-very-best"]

the-very-best

Well, Rockstar saw the success and they gave it Manhunt 2, not GTA. Capcom saw the success and gave it RE:UC, not RE5 or DMCIV.

I'm just saying that devs realise that PS3/360 are gonna be around for a long time and the audiences on those consoles enjoy the big games like GTA, RE, Burnout, MGS, FF, Halo etc, while Nintendo are dominating the software charts on the Wii, which may discourage some devs. Also the audience is different.

well wii cant handle the best graphics truth, but what iam sayng is that those developers will start to focus more on Wii games incressing their overall quality making more good games for the wii.

they wont giveup on 360 or ps3 since as you said they have more power under the hood, so i belive we will start to see more exclusives and less ports this gen from now on.(at least i hope that)

so overall i kinda agree with you, but i belive the wii will get more attention from developers and that could result on some good quality games

edit: and i hate glitchspot

[QUOTE="Zeliard9"]

:lol:

Not even close. The only game with a legitimate chance of dethroning Crysis as graphics king is Project Offset. The PC version, of course.

PS3_3DO

Need to get your eyes check. :lol:

hes eyes are just fine, you need to get your common sense checked tho

You seems to know quite a bit about lcd's, so let me throw this at you, these monitors got really low refresh rate and can handle these resolution because they are 6 bit panels... they can't render as much as a crt.

To give you an exemple, an 8 bit panel 19 inch 1280X1024 native reso cost as much as 400$. I know, I got one.

My dell 19 inch1440x900 widescreen was 180$. If your soending 400$ you should be getting way higher resolution then that.

well he got ripped off, where i live theres a 90% tax on some eletronic devices, such as monitors and videogames, (pc hardware does not apply tho)

It will get more games.

But explain why GTAIV isn't going to Wii. Or RE5. Or DMCIV. Or COD4. Or Assassin's Creed. Or any other major 3rd party title. Devs have to look into what console is right for them. It's more than just about sales.

the-very-best

because they never saw the wii sucess coming, thats why they didnt got serious into developing for the Wii, that might change, but iam not so sure it will

do we really need more generic fps's?

cmon it has nice graphics and all, but gameplay seems kinda iffy, FarCry 2 looks much more promising then this(and this game is pretty much a farcry wannabe)

I could have been playing GTAIV now if it wasn't for the PS3.-D3MO-

nice come back, too bad this wont be enough to end this thread

[QUOTE="Mizarus"][QUOTE="Redgarl"][QUOTE="BobHipJames"][QUOTE="cobrax75"]

[QUOTE="Redgarl"]PC is higher than 702p... but not 1080p... 1080p is just stupid, it's bring almost nothing to the experience.
Redgarl

you can go higher than 1080p on a PC...a lot higher.

3000x2000, I think, is the latest resolution they're pushing.

1000$ for a screen and a computer that can't handle any game at this resolution. Don't tell me it's for work, I don't see how it could be better, and I am a PS pro.

most 22 inches lcd screens cand o 1900x1200 thats higher then 1080p

You seems to know quite a bit about lcd's, so let me throw this at you, these monitors got really low refresh rate and can handle these resolution because they are 6 bit panels... they can't render as much as a crt.

To give you an exemple, an 8 bit panel 19 inch 1280X1024 native reso cost as much as 400$. I know, I got one.

mine is 8bits as well and it coasted pretty much the same thing as yours did, i just think a 6bit panel is enough, most people wont tell the diference, and those 22inches moniors arent suited for games yet(even tho some people play with them) i agree, but they go higher then 1080p, that was my point