Mizarus' forum posts

Avatar image for Mizarus
Mizarus

1379

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Mizarus
Member since 2004 • 1379 Posts

wii will end up selling more, its cheaper, most parents will rather give their kids a wii then a 360 since its more interative and it seems more healthy then the avarage videogame, also has less violent games out there for the wii.

has a bigger casual market, and its more popular on japan then the 360 is, dont think on the USA as the whole world, also Devil Man Cry's never will sell more system then Casual games.

Avatar image for Mizarus
Mizarus

1379

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Mizarus
Member since 2004 • 1379 Posts
[QUOTE="Mizarus"][QUOTE="Danm_999"][QUOTE="Polaris_choice"][QUOTE="imprezawrx500"][QUOTE="-D3MO-"]

Do not get a PC now, DX10 isin't worth it right now. Wait till MS fixes the Vista and DX10 bugs. Then go for the PC.

As for the PS3...its up to you. I personally have one, enjoy it, own R:FOM, Motorstorm, R&C, and a few others, play it fairly often. Its not a bad console. But again I have all the consoles and a PC, worked hard for all of 'em.

I'd recommend waiting on both though. Unless you really must play R:FOM or Motorstorm, both great games BTW, I would wait till next year.

Polaris_choice

that's no reason not to get a pc as dx9 pcs still leaves consoles in the dust. just look at crysis, bioshock etc

No DX9 pc leaves consoles in the dust look at the whooping bioshock put on most pc's DX9 has nothing on either the PS3 or 360.

Funny, GameSpot says the 360 only surpasses Bioshock on PC when the PC version is turned down to medium. (HINT: Dx9 cards aren't capped at medium, they can run on high!).

As for Crysis, you can run that on high on a Dx9 card. Guess what, it looks better than any 360/PS3 game.

crysis on medium looks better then most console games out there, if we are talking about graphics here the pc will be always on top, now when discussing games, its all about preferences.

Crysis on Medium looks better then most pc games towhats your point?

read the whole post and you will see that i pretty much said this.

"in the end graphics do not matter"

Avatar image for Mizarus
Mizarus

1379

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Mizarus
Member since 2004 • 1379 Posts

[QUOTE="agentfred"]Anyway, BF2 has ranked servers, for free.darklord888


And that's even made by EA! You know somethings wrong when EA are doing things better than you.

lol, its sad because its truth.

Avatar image for Mizarus
Mizarus

1379

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Mizarus
Member since 2004 • 1379 Posts
i think the Ds is doing pretty good and nintendo turned out being smarter then anyone could have antecipated, i woudnt underestimate nintendo's again.
Avatar image for Mizarus
Mizarus

1379

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Mizarus
Member since 2004 • 1379 Posts
[QUOTE="Polaris_choice"][QUOTE="imprezawrx500"][QUOTE="-D3MO-"]

Do not get a PC now, DX10 isin't worth it right now. Wait till MS fixes the Vista and DX10 bugs. Then go for the PC.

As for the PS3...its up to you. I personally have one, enjoy it, own R:FOM, Motorstorm, R&C, and a few others, play it fairly often. Its not a bad console. But again I have all the consoles and a PC, worked hard for all of 'em.

I'd recommend waiting on both though. Unless you really must play R:FOM or Motorstorm, both great games BTW, I would wait till next year.

Danm_999

that's no reason not to get a pc as dx9 pcs still leaves consoles in the dust. just look at crysis, bioshock etc

No DX9 pc leaves consoles in the dust look at the whooping bioshock put on most pc's DX9 has nothing on either the PS3 or 360.

Funny, GameSpot says the 360 only surpasses Bioshock on PC when the PC version is turned down to medium. (HINT: Dx9 cards aren't capped at medium, they can run on high!).

As for Crysis, you can run that on high on a Dx9 card. Guess what, it looks better than any 360/PS3 game.

crysis on medium looks better then most console games out there, if we are talking about graphics here the pc will be always on top, now when discussing games, its all about preferences.

Avatar image for Mizarus
Mizarus

1379

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Mizarus
Member since 2004 • 1379 Posts
oh btw, i woudnt get a 360 on a small enclosed space, same for the wii since it dosent have a cooler.
Avatar image for Mizarus
Mizarus

1379

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Mizarus
Member since 2004 • 1379 Posts
[QUOTE="agentfred"][QUOTE="Pro_wrestler"][QUOTE="agentfred"][QUOTE="horrowhip"]

... wait so this means that you can't do multiplayer without Gold... Wow... THIS is why GFW-Live is bull****...

WuTangG

Really? I thought they were letting you play online with silver, but I could be wrong.

They are, but you can't play ranked matches in Silver..I personally find it pointless. Its not like this ultra tacticle/technical game gameplay-wise so why even bother proving anything. I just had a thought, maybe their reason for non-dedicated servers is so they can dictate this silver/gold thing. AHHH the MSFT milkage extends to the PC! Well, its were it all started so no surprise there.

I hate you Microsoft.:(

They couldn't even let us play ranked matches without charging us? Maybe they don't understand how many preferable online PC shooters there are, that are also free. Why pay to play Gears when I can play CS, UT, etc. for free?

Since when did you ever happy ranked matches anyway?

battlefield has ranks based on achivements.kills, and suport actions, CS has a rank system based on Kill/Deaths ratio, TF shares the same rank as cs, and i think there are achivements for TS aswell. as a couple of other games that have those systems but i cant remember all of them now

Avatar image for Mizarus
Mizarus

1379

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Mizarus
Member since 2004 • 1379 Posts

As of right now I would have to say save up money and buy a nice PC. PS3 doesn't have that many quality titles out for it at the moment.

arcmanis

[QUOTE="m3Boarder32"]

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="m3Boarder32"]OMG! EAX can do 128 voices!! Watch out!! LALAMLAMA...Please..That aint Vandalvideo

EAX, "it realyl whips the llama's ***". Only a person who hasn't experienced it could say that EAX isn't all that. It IS all that and a bag of chips.

http://www.gamespot.com/features/6147812/index.html

PlayStation 3 Audio

Next-gen consoles like the PlayStation 3 make considerable inroads into improving what goes into your ears. The PS3 will be able to run up to 512 different voices, and apply different sound layers onto them depending on what the developer wishes. More voices means more concurrent sounds--like background music, cars screeching, crashing, guns shooting, and people talking. More layers means more ways to filter the sound. For example, the developer can change the sound of a gunshot to fit into a cave-like environment. The PS3 will support up to eight channels of audio, or 7.1, running at 96KBs per channel. Reduced-channel formats, like Dolby Digital 5.1, will have higher bit-rate audio streams. We've had 5.1 surround sound since the last generation of games, but expect more games to take advantage of the virtualization features with better sound placement.

That still isn't anything like what EAX is: Multi-EnvironmentsTM Supports rendering of multiple simultaneous audio environments in real-time, enabling the creation of exceptionally realistic acoustic environments in games containing multiple locations/rooms where differences in size, texture and/or shape are present. Environment PanningTM Makes spatializing and localizing environments in 3D possible, providing new 3D gaming effects never heard before. Environment ReflectionsTM Offers localization of early reflections and echoes, bringing more detail and realism to 3D gaming. Environment FilteringTM Accurately simulates the propagation of sound in both open and closed environments. Environment MorphingTM Allows for seamless transition of audio from one environment to the next. Extreme Effects New EAX effects rendered by an extended reverberation algorithm that surpasses the complexity of many studio-based reverb processors. Extended Hardware Effects The Sound Blaster® Audigy®, Audigy® 2 and Audigy® 2 ZS have extended effects, normally only used in music creation (Flanger, Echo, Distortion and Ring Modulation). EAX 4.0 ADVANCED HD can now tap into these effects for real-time manipulation of audio streams that provide developers with new ways to deliver unique audio in gaming environments. http://www.soundblaster.com/resources/read.asp?articleid=53831 This is hardware/software accelration NOT found on consoles in any capacity, end of story, I win.

i think no one debunks more pc to console myths more then you do, too bad most people just ignore posts like this

Avatar image for Mizarus
Mizarus

1379

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Mizarus
Member since 2004 • 1379 Posts

Do not get a PC now, DX10 isin't worth it right now. Wait till MS fixes the Vista and DX10 bugs. Then go for the PC.

As for the PS3...its up to you. I personally have one, enjoy it, own R:FOM, Motorstorm, R&C, and a few others, play it fairly often. Its not a bad console. But again I have all the consoles and a PC, worked hard for all of 'em.

I'd recommend waiting on both though. Unless you really must play R:FOM or Motorstorm, both great games BTW, I would wait till next year.

-D3MO-

yup i agree with this guy, wait a bit, pc hardware is always getting cheaper, and ps3 needs more games to really be worthy of your money, only buy a specifc plataform now if you are absolutly sure that you want to play more X games on one plataform then on the other.

also remember, the pc can do more then play games, and the ps3 can play blu ray, so it all depends on what you rather have.

Avatar image for Mizarus
Mizarus

1379

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Mizarus
Member since 2004 • 1379 Posts

Oh man, bad move on Epic's part. Actually, this isn't the first one, in recent memory.

Something's wrong. :?
MoldOnHold
Oh man, bad move on Epic's part. Actually, this isn't the first one, in recent memory.

Something's wrong. :?
MoldOnHold

its not epic, iam pretty sure that microsoft is behind this one