Mizarus' forum posts

Avatar image for Mizarus
Mizarus

1379

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Mizarus
Member since 2004 • 1379 Posts

[QUOTE="Mizarus"]i would consider it, even tho id still need a med end pc for a few other things then gaming, but yeah if it had all the strong aspects of the pc(gaming related only) and the strong aspects of a console it would be the ultimate gaming system, and the consoles are indeed evolvling we might see something like that down the futureNuclearDruid

Consoles are becoming pc's. If consoles got all those features, there would be almost no difference. And I have no doubt in my mind the companies would add extra features like web-browsing, chatting etc.

well i meant 3dmax and photoshop

Avatar image for Mizarus
Mizarus

1379

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Mizarus
Member since 2004 • 1379 Posts
[QUOTE="True_Gamer_"][QUOTE="naval"][QUOTE="True_Gamer_"][QUOTE="naval"]

switch to console : never

consider a console along with pc : when they have Kb +m support

naval

WHy is that? Consoles offer a VERY nice graphics/power to price ratio and some very decent features only if teh games were more reasonably priced they just lack MK support and freedom on software modding...

miss out on starcraft 2, crysis, CoH etc no way. also, consoles needed a bit more ram to be comaprable to decent pcs

Well with the above criteria there wouldnt be a reason to game on a PC...apart from pure technical standpoint...As things are now here in EU STarcraft 2 and Crysis combined will cost like one PS3 game alone...so PC is still teh king even in price to power ratio...

if you assume almost all pc games come out consoles and they haven't been dumbed down etc there are still lots of probelms. you forget that even if consoles get kb + m , most of the people would prefer controllers. i prefer envoirment in fps, rts etc where almost everyone uses kb +m for playing andthis ain't happening on a console

from what i understood, on the scenario he described that woudnt happen, games woudnt be dumbed down, it would basicly be a gaming only pc plataform kind of console, being able to play games only thus requiring lower system requirements, it would have all the perks a console has and most of the advantage the pc has right now, so it would basicly be a win-win situation.

Avatar image for Mizarus
Mizarus

1379

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Mizarus
Member since 2004 • 1379 Posts
i would consider it, even tho id still need a med end pc for a few other things then gaming, but yeah if it had all the strong aspects of the pc(gaming related only) and the strong aspects of a console it would be the ultimate gaming system, and the consoles are indeed evolvling we might see something like that down the future
Avatar image for Mizarus
Mizarus

1379

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Mizarus
Member since 2004 • 1379 Posts
[QUOTE="skrat_01"]

Crysis in its curent state wont run on puny console hardware.

Sorry fanboys that is the reality of it.

XanderZane

Yup.. and this is why it will be lucky to sell over 500,000 copies when it's released. No wonder Crysis wants to bring it to game consoles. After seeing Halo 3's sales numbers, they probably started drooling. :lol: Seriously though, if it's not going to run like it should on gamers PC's, why bother getting it? ;)

because ive played the beta and runs better then i expected? sure it has its ups and downs but its a beta, iam able to play on low with a steady fps rate most of the time, and my brother is able to run on high with steady fps's also most of the time.

Avatar image for Mizarus
Mizarus

1379

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Mizarus
Member since 2004 • 1379 Posts
[QUOTE="luigigreen"][QUOTE="jet052006"][QUOTE="luigigreen"][QUOTE="jet052006"]

[QUOTE="luigigreen"]Ok, I still play games in 480p, but that doesn't stop them being good. That's like saying every game in the past generations, previous of the PS2, Xbox and GCN generation, are bad because they aren't in HD. BTW, I accept ownage. I'm not going to be a fanboy and try to defend my loss. But still, HD means barely anything to me. That's why I know so little about the subject. I'd much rather focus on the quality of the game, not high many pixels a game can produce on one screen.jet052006

Well I see it as this, Im able to get both a great gaming experience even better than what the Wii has to offer at this time (going by gamespot scores) and im able to enjoy top notch graphics aswell. Why wouldnt someone want the best of both worlds?

I'm not saying that you can't have both. I'm just saying that their are games for the Wii out now, and that are going to be coming out that look fun and exciting, no matter what definition the game is in.

But the problem with the Wii is that you cant have both.

But you don't need both to have an enjoyable gaming experience. I can have just as much fun playing SSBM with my friends, then playing Halo 3 with my friends. It comes down which game is more enjoyable. I'm not very picky when it comes to graphics.

Well in some cases you need those things to have any form of a gaming experience. If Wii had those things Nintendo fans wouldnt be missing out on re5, or Assassins Creed, or other various titles unable to go to the Wii. Also graphics can make or brake a game for examply look at Far Cry its has been called generic at times, but because of its great visuals it was able to set it apart from other FPS.

please farcry was only good on the pc, and it had more to do with the gamplay then the graphics

Avatar image for Mizarus
Mizarus

1379

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Mizarus
Member since 2004 • 1379 Posts
lol why all this bashing, no one was even hyping this game, people expect things like this to flop, wait till something big to flop people then you come in and make 8 pages about it
Avatar image for Mizarus
Mizarus

1379

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Mizarus
Member since 2004 • 1379 Posts

this been a hellaof a year and there are enough contenders for the goty already, uncharted maybe would make goty if he wasnt fighting giants.

this year we had and are going to have.

Halo3,Crysis,Ut3, iam pretty sure one of those 3 will grab GOTY SSBB is also coming out, Super mario galaxy, and iam sure there are more strong contenders out there, uncharted is a underdog this year

Avatar image for Mizarus
Mizarus

1379

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Mizarus
Member since 2004 • 1379 Posts
well even tho he said it might come to the consoles, he kinda also said that it would have to be a slightly diferent version and that theres no development in process yet, and that if they made the game for the consoles they would optmise them the best they could so the game woudnt be dumbed down or lost its pace, so basicly if there is a console version we are probly gonig to have to wait a couple of years, games like that take a lot of time to be developed i dont think we will see crysis for consoles anytime soon, if this turns out to be truth it should be anounced in the end of this year or middle 2008 and dev should take what? 3-4 years? i woudnt get excited about this.
Avatar image for Mizarus
Mizarus

1379

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Mizarus
Member since 2004 • 1379 Posts
i do see a crysis spinoff coming out for consoles, but wont be the same game, they will do the same thing they did with farcy but this time they will probly develop the game by themselfs so no one mess their game up again.
Avatar image for Mizarus
Mizarus

1379

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Mizarus
Member since 2004 • 1379 Posts
starcraft 2