@deadfamous @Stevo_the_gamer Because they would have a hard time justifying a $60 multiplayer game, adding he campaign allows them to say the MP is the bonus material. Any game that doesn't have ANY single player DLC included in their season pass was developed strictly for MP...
@penguino522 You haven't even played the game yet and say it has no assassins, lol. How about you look at the story instead of looking at videos of people explaining how the free roam works...
@berethor099 If the way the community acts on Splinter Cell Blacklist, having no MP is actually better. In SC: Blacklist people either quit out of losing matches or pull their internet, botch cases cause you to lose EVERYTHING you earned in MP for that day. I understand that they want to "try out" some things in games but COD has infected every game that has a MP mode...
@3v1LR0n1N @WantYouBad Nobody understands that anything over 34 FPS just appears to be smoother to the human eye. I love when people say they can tell the difference between 40 and 60 FPS...
@WantYouBad It's not the next gen consoles, it's the developers. COD has consistently ran at 60 FPS for almost every game they made despite it being nothing more than varied rehashes. Killzone is 60 FPS, Forza 5 is 60 FPS, Ubisoft just ported Watch dogs to the next gen systems the same way they will port it to the PC. People are acting like the next gen will automatically make games at a higher quality, it's the developers that have to MAKE the games look good.
Consoles don't exist because of their computing power, they exist because of the exclusives. And consoles get the lead way when it comes to the multiplatform games. NVIDIA is just trying to garner peoples attention by trash-talking consoles "again". Two different markets that will never blend, this is not news but childish banter...
Moegitto's comments