Mass Effect > Uncharted

ReverseCycology

ok!! Can you list any reasons of why Mass Effect is better than Uncharted other than game length? I can make you a laundry list of why Uncharted is better, so please don't make any fanboyism remarks without the ability to support them

So i just picked up Uncharted about 2 days ago and the game is awsome... it might just be me but i love the setting, the graphics, the platforming, the gunplay, and the all around feel of the game is great. So idk if anyone else picked it up and liked it as much as me, but this is definitely my favorite game for the PS3 yet.CQckRooster429

I am 88% in, and I absolutely love it. Never I was attached to a game like that. I will go through it again I believe.

is the game gonna be sold in shops or on psn...and if on psn wats the price if anyone knows?planbfreak4eva

I have heard rumors say the game will be free, and others that the game will be 40 bucks, so I dont know.

*PUZZLE SPOILER ALERT*

If you lookin your journal you'll see that the statues are facing a certain direction on the compass (North south east or west). You just have to adjust the statues so that they face the directions they're facing in the journal

duffman0084

ok, I will try that, thanks

you should get UT3. the Orange Box is being ported over by EA, and it will definitely not be as good as the PC or the 360 version as it has been previewed and it seems to have many problems. I'd go with UT3.

Man, I am definitely no RPG guy, but I am still enjoying the game very much and probably will play it again no doubt. It's so fun fighting the pirates!!

Anyway, I am at the part where I have to move some statues named Mark, Luke, John, and Mathew. they tell you to look at the booklet, but I can't figure out what they want me to do. I turned the statues so they are all facing the compassor whatever, but nothing happened. Could anybody tell me what to do? Thanks.

[QUOTE="MotoZuki13"]

[QUOTE="carsales"]I have both and the ps3 in it's one year has done nothing to impress me. I like playing blu ray movies. The 360 is simply better. better games, better graphics, better online, better controll, better price,and better multiplats. Its just better. All my 360 games are 1080p and most of the ps3 games are 720p. 1080p>720p. 360>ps3.carsales

have you played uncharted? Plus, what did the 360 have in its first year that impressed you that the PS3 didn't have in its first year? I know quite a few people that weren't impressed with the 360 until gears came out, so that would be a little over a year for the 360 until something decent came out for it.

Kameo?? :lol: that is the joke of the day. I'm calling you a fakeboy. Uncharted is the best looking game on consoles, and gears does not look better because I have it on the PC (running at 1680x1050 on quad 4, 8800GT). I don't think you own a PS3, sorry. Plus, the multiplats won't tell you the complete story unless the game is developed separetely on both consoles and the devs are actually famaliar with PS3 programming. Give the PS3 one more year, then we will compare the multiplats.

I have both and the ps3 in it's one year has done nothing to impress me. I like playing blu ray movies. The 360 is simply better. better games, better graphics, better online, better controll, better price,and better multiplats. Its just better. All my 360 games are 1080p and most of the ps3 games are 720p. 1080p>720p. 360>ps3.carsales

have you played uncharted? Plus, what did the 360 have in its first year that impressed you that the PS3 didn't have in its first year? I know quite a few people that weren't impressed with the 360 until gears came out, so that would be a little over a year for the 360 until something decent came out for it.

reply to kodiacGTS:

Well, finally somebody responded with some intelligence, lol. There are intelligent lemmings I guess.

1. I do believe my first point is valid. Higher resolution LCD's aren't that far from coming out. they already make those you know, but they use them for computers. I believe that we will see TV's with higher resolutions in two or three years and the PS3 will be able to support it. Plus, you don't think a console can have 8-9 years lifespan. Look at the PS2. It's selling better than both the 360 and the PS3 and even bringing out great games like GOW 1,2. Also the I said in the begining of the thread that it's about the future, not present. Yes the average Joe does not have a 7.1 surround system, but in a couple of years they will and the PS3 supports it.

2. my point about the ram was to bring a point on how fast technology demand rise. Technology demands better hardwareevery year. it's no big deal. maybe a bad example. My point is that we will move to higher resolution TV's and we will see 30GB games, and xbox can't support them. The PS3 does.

3. As for the HDD access, 30Gb games don't need to have 30Gb of harddrive space to be streamed there. You can have a buffer of 10Gb on the hdd that you could use as long as that buffer fills fast enough on the fly. so I don't think there is any need for bigger space on HDD. The current HDD will support it fine.

4.Yes i do remember what I was playing 9 years ago. I was playing GT on PS1. The games that came out for the PS2 when it first launched and the games that come out for it now, i.e. GOW, are totally different because Developers get really good with a system after that long. if we have a real life example of a system lasting about 8 years(ps2), why don't you believe it?

5. not sure about the Pentium IV. I had studied teh MIPS back in my day and that had a 5 stage pipeline in it. Moore's law isn't even a law. It's just a fact that technology advances very fast.

6. Why is mentioning RROD fanboyism? It's a fact. what's wrong with that? It's got major hardware problems. in a couple of years, what makes you think that the average Joe will buy a 360 over a PS3 knowing that one has a 30% failure rate vs the other, not to mention all the "stuff" the PS3 comes with out of the box. Come on, don't you see this?

7. my point about the PS3 having only 512MB of memory was a downside. you probably just missed that word. That wasn't a complement of it.