So exciting!

Clearly they just gave up on the new revision on bulldozer and are just going straight for piledriver. Hopefully this will make the desktop variant competitive with the core I's on every level.

[QUOTE="NailedGR"]

Ricer is a deragatory term for a japanese modded car, like what you see in fast and the furius, which is what started the craze.

jonleeprice

Where did I say it didn't exist before the films? I said the films started the craze, i.e. made putting lights under the car popular.

Ricer is a deragatory term for a japanese modded car, like what you see in fast and the furius, which is what started the craze.

I use to use a Asus Xonar D2X along Sennheiser HD 555's to Acoustic Energy Aego M 2.1 speakers and never will I use head phone ever again... unless the baby is sleeping. Otherwise head phones just don't compare.Grey_Eyed_Elf

You accidentally a few words in your post.

[QUOTE="SkyWard20"]Then we're sending them the correct message, since we're not buying those games that aren't on sale, precisely because they're not on sale. We're telling them those games are too expensive.

Pedro

Then the overall quality of good games would suffer because the returns would not cover the cost of development. I hope you and your peeps would be fine with that. :)

honestly, gaming was better when they weren't spending 200 mil on each game.

So I have my cash ready for a nice ivy bridge upgrade but I want to know if there's a confirmed release date for the actual processors yet? Preferably one for the i5's

Physorac

the performance is going to be nearly identical. The only benefit is going to be better integrated graphics and lower power consumption. However rumors are out that say the overclocking is worse as they heat up too fast to match the sandy bridge overclocks.

I wouldn't want to buy it after the crapfest I got from crysis 2.

Good quality 2.0 headphones >>>> surround headphones >>> headsets

Don't use 32 bit.

[QUOTE="NailedGR"]

[QUOTE="SF_KiLLaMaN"] Another person misunderstanding my point. What a shame.SF_KiLLaMaN

the problem is your point is a bad point.

It would only make sense if a digital copy of a game was a scarce resource, which it isn't.

That makes even less sense because in every possible way buying 12 games for 70 and playing 6 of them nets you more total enjoyment time, less total cost, more total options than buying 2 games for 120

If this were economics we would be talking about enjoyment hours per dollar spent.

So lets say you get 10 hours of enjoyment per game played.

spending 70 on 12 games nets you 6 games played.

6 games played gets you 60 enjoyment hours at a cost of 70 dollars

spending 120 on 2 games nets you 2 games played.

2 games played gets you 20 enjoyment hours at a cost of 120 dollars

Buying 12 games 6 of which you play for 70 dollars will cost you 1.16 dollars per hour of enjoyment

Buying 2 games for 120 dollars will cost you 6 dollars per hour of enjoyment

clearly buying more games, some of which you won't play, is wasting less money.