In quality? :|

Really? In Singleplayer yeah maybe. But in everything else? Hell no. Battlefield has always had better graphics, gameplay and multiplayer.

Hell no, Crysis 2 and etc. come first. ;)

Really loving some of the points mentioned, except for the ' Rapel down buildings ' idea.

[QUOTE="ZumaJones07"][QUOTE="charlesdarwin55"]What made you think it was funny? charlesdarwin55

THAT'S NOT FUNNY and there's nothing "to get", they're just doing stuff that normal annoying children usually does.

Russia or China, but you'd be a fool to even attack America.

I don't normally say this, but come on...blog this, we really don't need a series on why you don't believe in a faith.ice144

If you want a definition of gullible, there it is.

The ones ' You just read my sig. ' and etc.

I want the 5 minutes of my life back I wasted reading all of those.

[QUOTE="Solid_Denton"]

The hate is getting stupid at this stage. I even see people hating on the supposed boxart. People hating on the larger maps and destructible enviroments "Buh teh Battlefield had it first !!!". Give the game a chance for all we know the graphics could be superb and it could have dedicated servers and some anti-campers stuff. If it has dedicated servers then that will pretty much fix most peoples beef with the COD series. So all that I am saying is that Activision or Bobby Kotick has never done anything to hurt you have they ?? And this isn't about them this is about the fact that Infinity Ward could be making a superb product. So when the reveal gameplay is shown don't go into the video with a big sour head getting ready to hate on it no matter what and actually wait and see if it looks good.

super600

You do know there are three dev teams developing the game?

Yeah no. Apparently, ít's going to have premium features, so if I want better stuff, I'm going to pay for it? Hell no,I'd rather play Battlefield 3 anyday.