The Dark Knight, only because I haven't seen Inception.

Stubbornness killed the dictator.

Tactical nuke inbound . . .

[QUOTE="NiteLights"]

[QUOTE="kuraimen"] There's never been a good government buddy, and there will never be. The quicker you accept that, the better. I'm not saying I support it, but sadly it's how things are.

Well, I did a recopilation of a very small sample of the kind of things Wikileaks has made public in another thread:

Yeah because pimping boys in Afghanistan and consealing it is not against the law, asking the Uganda government to tell the US when they are going to use their intelligence to commit warcrimes as a heads up only is not against the law, pressuring governments backstage to spare soldiers that have commited murder is not against the law, US oil companies infiltrating people in foreign nations to control internal politics in their favor is not against the law, kidnapping an innocent man and then pressuring a foreign government to not pursue the kidnappers is not against the law, a US pharmaceutical company making illegal experimentation with drugs on children and then blackmailing foreign government officials to dismiss the case is not against the law.

So if Anonymous is supporting a group that is trying to make these kind of things public so they hopefully never happens again I guess Anonymous actions are quite noble. They could even be saving lives.

kuraimen

[QUOTE="KamuiFei"]

[QUOTE="kuraimen"] Well most people I had talked with here condemned the hacking practice as being that of kiddies and terrorists so how is it? is hacking bad or is hacking good?kuraimen

You can't be serious. MI6 did this mainly to hinder Al Qaeda from killing innocent people. Anon and others like them do it annoy and steal information for personal gain. Hacking itself isn't a bad practice, but when its applied to annoy, steal, cheat or affect law abiding citizens in a negative way, then hacking is a bad thing. If it helps save peoples' lives then yes, hacking can be a good thing.

Well, I did a recopilation of a very small sample of the kind of things Wikileaks has made public in another thread:

Yeah because pimping boys in Afghanistan and consealing it is not against the law, asking the Uganda government to tell the US when they are going to use their intelligence to commit warcrimes as a heads up only is not against the law, pressuring governments backstage to spare soldiers that have commited murder is not against the law, US oil companies infiltrating people in foreign nations to control internal politics in their favor is not against the law, kidnapping an innocent man and then pressuring a foreign government to not pursue the kidnappers is not against the law, a US pharmaceutical company making illegal experimentation with drugs on children and then blackmailing foreign government officials to dismiss the case is not against the law.

So if Anonymous is supporting a group that is trying to make these kind of things public so they hopefully never happens again I guess Anonymous actions are quite noble. They could even be saving lives.

[QUOTE="Pirate700"]

[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]I think she looks fine in both images.. Why must people attack some one who dresses eccentrically? Where the hell would the fun be if every one dressed boringly.sSubZerOo

:| Yep because no celebrity ever does this.. They don't spend thousands of dollars on dresses and suits for red carpet events that they will only ever wear once..

Wow. Some of the answers on this thread. :?

I really want to dowload it again, but damn, 10 gigs worth of broadband on one game. :P

Is it still worth downloading?

It's 10 gigs to download. :|

Honestly, any idea's why it's so big? That's way too much broadband on one game.

Yeah it is, but that doesn't mean it's better, now does it. ;)