[QUOTE="LanceUppercut77"]Jeff is not biased, he simply has a different opinion than you. He is entitled to his opinions. I often disagree with review scores, but that doesn't mean the reviewer is biased. Review scores are only opinions. Are you capable of forming your own opinions? I don't care about scores. Red Steel scored a 5.5, but that doesn't stop me from enjoying it. If you really like the game, then buy it. Jeff's opinion should not change yours. Get over it.poopinloop32So we've come face to face havent we Jeff:o lmfao
O_Lineman17's forum posts
What do you guys think? Is the 360 pushing the industry forward?The 360 does what every new generation does, updates graphics, brings new features in as well as old ones, basically just improves on everything that was on systems last-gen, and it's the same with the PS3 like you mentioned. The PS3 is just adding in Blu-Ray, but you can also buy a HD-DVD player for the 360. I have both systems and too me, the only major differences between them are the Blu-Ray, and the games they offer. And from using both PSN and XBL, I can honestly say that Xbox Live is more immersive, but I do like the internet browser on PSN. All three systems offer something different, whether it's classified as Nex-Gen is a matter of oppinion. To me, all of the systems are Nex-Gen, they offer something new.
I look at the 360 and while I do think it's a great console I don't see anything in it that screams out "next gen". It sometimes just feels like an Xbox with updated graphics. I also have the same problem with the PS3 but I feel it offers more (you have to pay much more too though).
It seems to me as if MS is simply going after one key demographic: male teens. They've got games like Mass Effect, Halo, Gears, and not really much variety in their library with the odd exception of games like Kameo, or Banjo.
We all talk about Wii's novelty wearing off but how much longer will people put up with the 360 if they realize it's not bringing anything majorly new to the table?
Perhaps I'm being to critical... What do you guys think? Agree/Disagree?
the-very-best
[QUOTE="O_Lineman17"][QUOTE="parshanb"][QUOTE="O_Lineman17"][QUOTE="parshanb"][QUOTE="O_Lineman17"]I got two copies of the game one for computer that's rated T, and new copy for 360 that's rated M (don't ask why I got the 2nd copy)parshanbhey, yo dont know notice difference between the 360 version and pc version, some parts in the game are different, i have both too no I noticed, I just know that some people don't have both copies, and some wouldn't know that there were differences, so I did for anyone that would call me stupid for getting both, I just don't like trying to convice people. what do you mean? anyway i noticed some difference, like you start at some other place when you get out of the prison at the begining! I mean I don't like to convince people what they don't know...? words? lol. Like people may think there are no differences in either of the versions, just because the 360 is a straight port, so I don't want to fight with someone trying to convince them otherwise. And yea, that is a difference I noticed to, and many of the dungeons are in different areas of the map ye, i got the Pc version first, then played 360, i thought it was the exact game , but there are differences, ye like i couldnt find 2 dugneons and 1 town when i got our of prison, since the 360 version brings me out from another place, and why wasnt this on the video review, Greg only said that the perfomance is different Idk, I guess he doesn't find the differences big enough to talk about. It's not like the differences were a problem for me, just that they are there, and can make things a bit confusing if you played one version before another.
Log in to comment