The other one got locked, because I forgot that the other word for crap was illegal. (sowwie modz)

LINK

Ahhahahh... Cows? I think we should start calling them Owls now.

Teehee

:lol: Look at you BC2 fans get so easily riled up. This is such a sensitive topic, huh.

Just to clear things up, I intend on buying BC2. Destructible environments just can't be ignored by me... I've seen it in action, and I'm thoroughly impressed.

My original statement stands, still. BC2 sends a lot of nods over to MW2. This is okay, I never said "shame and eternal FIRE unto them!" for this. It was just an observation, and nothing to be offended over.

And no. I'm not going to offer any examples, or explanations. I've expressed my observation, and I don't feel like stumbling into a useless debate over which one is "better." BC2 and MW2 are apples and oranges, my livid gamers. Apples and Oranges.

The only fools are the ones who would write off either of them, and not thoroughly enjoy their differences and similarities on their own accord. The only reason why I haven't gotten it yet is the mere fact that my entire group of friends are still playing MW2, most of them don't even know or have heard of BC2.

*holds up flame shield*

No. Don't even get an HD T.V for wii. If you do, just make sure it has REAAALLY good SD quality.

Wii's actually look worse on HD screens in most cases. HD sets tend to display SD horribly. My Wii looked better on my old SD T.V.

Nintendo is lagging behind extremely over the lack of a basic online system. It's a source of great frustration for me. They continue to either ignore, or half-assedly work on online multiplayer, and it's sickening that they're so smug as to feel as if they don't need it. Granted, sure, maybe they don't NEED it because they're still making tons of money... But for us hardcore gamers, it's heartbreaking that they'd ignore our pleas.

Brawl would have been so much more enjoyable to me if they worked on the online multiplayer more than just offering 4 player free for all. Animal Crossing had an abysmal way of finding friends and visiting each others towns, it was more tedious and frustrating than pleasant and intuitive. You would think they would see what Sony and MS are doing and think, "oh. we could do something like that." instead, it seems like they see what they're doing with xbox live and PSN and think, "ugh.. Look at that. That will never be popular."

NINTENDO, GET OFF YOUR BUTTS AND STAY RELEVANT TO THE GAMING INDUSTRY

With Sony and Microsoft coming out with their own motion-based solutions, Nintendo doesn't have the wild card of saying they're the only ones with motion-controls.

They need HD to stay competitive now.

The two of them are so alike now, they ought to just get together one night, get drunk, forget to wear a condom, then pop out a lovechild nine months later.

Modern Warfare 3 should have destructible environments.

[QUOTE="KukicAdo"][QUOTE="crusadernm"]

But xbox is making profit. Sony still losing money on each ps3 sold. I rather have MS business plans.

crusadernm

I do have stock in Microsoft.

SUCKS TO BE YOU! :lol:

They both can co-exist peacefully. That is, until angry fanboys foaming at the mouth come here to bash each other over the head with their opinions. Sweet deal! (grabs popcorn)