Oresome's forum posts

Avatar image for Oresome
Oresome

111

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Oresome
Member since 2009 • 111 Posts

[QUOTE="VGobbsesser"]

[QUOTE="Burning-Sludge"]

The forth generation is better than the first, but the second one is still the best.

Burning-Sludge

As far as I'm concered,the fourth generation is easily the worst generation for the series yet.

Why is that?

Bad design of the Pokemon (even though Ruby/Sapp comes close)? I heard there's a lot of imbalances too with old vs new Pokemon?

Avatar image for Oresome
Oresome

111

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Oresome
Member since 2009 • 111 Posts

[QUOTE="VGobbsesser"]

If you were speaking just about handhelds,and if this were the first or second generation of the series,I would agree.But that isn't the case.

Burning-Sludge

The forth generation is better than the first, but the second one is still the best.

Minor improvements don't really make it better, considering the first came up with the concept and base of the game (the base for which the current games are still based on, sadly). Much hasn't changed since Gold/Silver.

Too bad too many kids buy into it, if people stopped caring they might actually make some solid changes to the series.

Avatar image for Oresome
Oresome

111

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Oresome
Member since 2009 • 111 Posts

Red Alert 2

Red Alert 3

Gamerz1569

remaking the same song shouldn't really count

Avatar image for Oresome
Oresome

111

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Oresome
Member since 2009 • 111 Posts

Red Alert hands down, anyone who says different hasn't played it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9GZFlou9O6Q

Even the menu music was superb.

Avatar image for Oresome
Oresome

111

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Oresome
Member since 2009 • 111 Posts

no zelda? that is meant to be 2010, tho i doubt it myself

Avatar image for Oresome
Oresome

111

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Oresome
Member since 2009 • 111 Posts

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vZ3F7bAguSo

Xbox360: The Ring 2

Avatar image for Oresome
Oresome

111

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Oresome
Member since 2009 • 111 Posts

They charge so that not everyone does it, and only those that really want to do it can. For example take a server and of the top 10 guilds 8 are on the horde side, If it was free all the decent alliance players would switch to the horde side in an instant hoping that they can get into a better guild, once there friends see this they would probably also come over, bringing more and more players from one faction to another, untill one was left totally dominant, and the other with the odd 80 here and there, and the rest alts and new playersIm_on_a_boat

Ummm... LOL

They charge so that not everyone does it

Simple 3-6 month limit will do that, not cash.

only those that really want to do it can

No, all those who made a mistake when starting up the game want to do it, lots of people want to change their characters. Anyway, it isn't HARD to do, so 'really want to do it' doesn't really apply'

For example take a server and of the top 10 guilds 8 are on the horde side, If it was free all the decent alliance players would switch to the horde side in an instant hoping that they can get into a better guild, once there friends see this they would probably also come over, bringing more and more players from one faction to another, untill one was left totally dominant, and the other with the odd 80 here and there, and the rest alts and new players


Ironicly that is just what happened when they allowed faction transfers... And why are you talking about faction transfers? This is about racial ones. All the major PVP players and guilds have all gone Undead from what I can see... Many Alliance on servers is completely dead now because Blizzard cared more about the money then faction balance.

Instead of creating a BALANCE system where a someone couldn't transfer if their faction they choose to jsut make people pay for it? Sorry but that doesn't make sense and the reality is completely against you.

You point is COMPLETELY nile. Since your example is EXACTLY WHAT HAPPENED even though people had to pay $30 for it, many many allience went Undead and many servers became completely imbalanced... Are you just completely lost? Are you not keeping up with the facts?


So cute how people still think Blizzard is an honest business! Yes, making people pay 25/30 USD is because they care for you!

LOL. just... LOL

Seems like a good deal to me.. If your really in to the game and have a character you have played for years and wish to move to a faction side your RL friends are on.. Go for it.. Its not like this is mandatory.. And this is pretty common practice for MMO's in general.

sSubZerOo

Actually this type of thing is why the MMORPG genre is in a complete hole. Charging for stuff that should be free (yet limited... well name changes, server transfers, and faction changes shouldn't even exist on a genre that is based around community... MAYBE name changing if you are getting abused by other players and for other similar reasons). 'oh other mmorpgs do it so its okay for blizz' is an excuse, not a valid reason, if Blizzard was TRULY an industry leader (which it never was, since most of its games are just building on what was already established, e.g. WoW from EQ/UO/etc, WC/WC2 from Dune II) then they would give this kind of service that should be free, as a free aspect of the game.

for $25, you could by five old but very decent games, some of which took years to develop from Steam or D2D... And you'd rather spend that on literally a few electric signals (yes changing your character isn't hard to do, it is just sending a few electric signals to different areas and there you have it)? There is no massive amounts of development time for stuff like this, sure there is maintence to make sure Blizzard's milkage happens correctly, but your subscription already pays for that minor maintence and tiny setup cost.

Avatar image for Oresome
Oresome

111

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Oresome
Member since 2009 • 111 Posts

fables 2 you get a dog, the dog wins

Avatar image for Oresome
Oresome

111

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Oresome
Member since 2009 • 111 Posts

that's just awesome. *waits for ps3 fans to downplay this*Mystery_Writer

Do they need to?

Pretty evident that MS is doing this exactly because they don't have blu-ray.

Avatar image for Oresome
Oresome

111

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Oresome
Member since 2009 • 111 Posts

cs1.3+ in cyber cafes